When Einstein knew gravity is geometry and not force

In summary, Einstein knew that gravity and electromagnetism could be unified geometrically in higher dimensions. He attempted to unify other forces as well, but it is difficult and has not yet been achieved. GUT is a specific way of unifying standard model forces without gravity, but it has been ruled out experimentally due to predicted observational effects. Currently, string theory is still unable to make testable predictions about interactions and particle masses.
  • #1
dpa
147
0
no gut?

well,

from GR or LQG as well, gravity is not force but geometry right?
When einstein knew gravity is geometry and not force, why did he try to unify them?
Will we have 3 fundamental forces.
Is gut ruled out?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


Einstein knew already since the twenties that gravity and electromagnetism can be unified; he was very impressed by the ideas of Kaluza and Klein. This idea (to unify the two 'forces' geometrically in higher dimensions and to 'break the unification' via dimensional reduction is still used in SUGRA and string theory). For other forces it's very difficult but as we learn from SUGRA and strings, it's not impossible.

GUT is used for a very special way of unification, namely for unification of standard model forces w/o gravity. Mathematically this is rather simple (no higher dimensions, no SUSY); you take a gauge group which is large enough - SU(5), SO(10), E(6) will do - write down the Lagrangian and introduce Higgses in an appropriate way to break the symmetry down to the SM. The problems are purely phenomenological: the larger gauge group comes with additional gauge bosons mediating new forces which induces obervational effects; and afaik all GUTs have been ruled out due to these new effects (e.g. due to the predicted proton decay which hasn't been observed).

Afaik the current status is that simple GUTs are ruled out experimentally and that string theory as a framework for describing SM+gravity as a low-energy sector (specific certain string vacua) is still not able to make testable predictions like specific interactions, particle masses etc.
 

1. When did Einstein discover that gravity is geometry and not a force?

Einstein first proposed his theory of general relativity in 1915, which showed that gravity is a result of the curvature of spacetime rather than a force. However, he had been working on this idea since 1907.

2. How did Einstein come to this realization?

Einstein was inspired by the work of mathematician Bernhard Riemann, who proposed the idea of curved space in his study of non-Euclidean geometry. Einstein also conducted many thought experiments and mathematical calculations to develop his theory.

3. What evidence supports Einstein's theory?

Einstein's theory has been extensively tested and has consistently been supported by various experiments and observations. Some of the most notable evidence includes the bending of light by massive objects, the precession of Mercury's orbit, and the gravitational lensing effect.

4. How does general relativity differ from Newton's theory of gravity?

Newton's theory of gravity considered gravity as a force between two masses, while general relativity sees gravity as a result of the curvature of spacetime. Additionally, general relativity accounts for the effects of acceleration and is a more accurate description of gravity at high speeds and in strong gravitational fields.

5. What impact did the discovery have on our understanding of the universe?

Einstein's theory of general relativity revolutionized our understanding of gravity and the universe as a whole. It provided a new framework for understanding the behavior of massive objects in space and has been crucial in predicting and explaining many phenomena, such as black holes and the expansion of the universe.

Similar threads

  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
9
Views
469
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
1
Views
180
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
915
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
2
Replies
65
Views
7K
Back
Top