Node analysis question

  • Thread starter srh
  • Start date
  • #1
srh
7
0

Homework Statement


(I have attached a picture of the circuit)
Using node voltage analysis in the circuit, find the current i drawn from the independent voltage source. Let V=3V, R1=1/2, R2=1/2, R3=1/4, R4=1/2, R5=1/4, I=0.5.


Homework Equations


I=V/R


The Attempt at a Solution


I haven't seen one like this w/ the independent voltage source, is it solved the same way? I tried to perform KCL at each node and got:
node 1: (V-v1)/R1 + v1/R2 + (v1-v2)/R3 = 0
node 2: (v1-v2)/R3 + (v3-v2)/R4 = I
node 3: (v3-v2)/R4 + v3/R5 = 0

When I substituted for V, I, R1, R2, R3, R4 and R5 and entered in the matrix I got:
v1=-6.375
Then I related i=(V-v1)/R1. I got an answer of 18.75 A. I thought the answer maybe sounded high and was wondering if I had messed up somewhere.
 

Attachments

  • circuits2.JPG
    circuits2.JPG
    4.5 KB · Views: 308

Answers and Replies

  • #2
quantumdude
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
5,575
23

The Attempt at a Solution


I haven't seen one like this w/ the independent voltage source, is it solved the same way?

Yes, but it's even better because an independent voltage source puts a constraint on the node voltages. The independent source is the reason that you have 3 node equations instead of 4.

v1=-6.375

Taking the current through R1, R2, and R3 to be going to the left, and taking the current through R2 and R5 to be going down, I wrote down the node equations and solved the model to find that v1=1.375 V (I did this all by hand mind you, so let the buyer beware), which will give a more reasonable current. Check your equations to make sure that you were consistent with the directions of your currents.
 
  • #3
Number2Pencil
208
1
Keep in mind that the voltage source can be treated this way because it's connected to ground. If it wasn't, as in it is inbetween two nodes, you'd just have to use a supernode with a supplemental.
 
  • #4
doodle
161
0
You only need to perform KCL at the nodes with more than 2 branches. And in the figure, there are only 2 such nodes (excepting the ground), i.e., the one common to R1, R2 and R3; and another common to R3, R4 and the current source.

node 1: (V-v1)/R1 + v1/R2 + (v1-v2)/R3 = 0

There is a mistake here. KCL requires either (1) the sum of all currents leaving the node equals zero, or (2) the sum of all currents entering the node equals zero. What you wrote above (for node 1) is not consistent with (1) or (2).
 
  • #5
ranger
Gold Member
1,685
2
Indeed, recheck your current directions for node 1 (R1, R2, and R3).
 

Suggested for: Node analysis question

  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
350
Replies
4
Views
862
  • Last Post
Replies
10
Views
486
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
786
  • Last Post
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
435
  • Last Post
Replies
0
Views
340
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
774
Replies
5
Views
638
Replies
2
Views
524
Top