# Noether Currents

1. Sep 27, 2014

### Breo

2. Sep 27, 2014

### Hypersphere

As Peskin and Schroeder present it, the calculus is essentially that of partial derivatives while treating $\phi$ and $\partial_\mu \phi$ as independent variables. For a given Lagrangian density $\mathcal{L}$, he defines the current in eq. (2.12). However, the current depends on the symmetry at hand, which enters through the $\mathcal{J}^\mu$ term, defined on the previous page.

If this still looks too opaque, do you remember the treatment of Noether's theorem in classical mechanics of particles?

3. Sep 28, 2014

### Breo

No, I didn't learn it in my classical mechanics subject.

My doubt is how it get those results for the currents. I tried to do the calcs but I get different results.

4. Sep 28, 2014

### Hypersphere

Ok... To be honest, that is a bit of a red flag! QFT is a tricky subject in its own right, but it relies heavily on classical mechanics. So you may want to pick up a good book and learn Lagrangians, variational calculus and Noether's theorem properly as soon as possible. Otherwise I think you may be in for a rough ride.

Could you show your work, say for the $\mathcal{L}=\left( \partial_\mu \phi \right)^2$ Lagrangian under the $\phi \rightarrow \phi + \alpha$ transformation? That way it'll be more clear to us where your problems lie.