Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Non linear spring derivation

  1. May 14, 2005 #1
    we all know the linear hookes law as f=kx where f is the force applied on a spring
    and x is the displacement and k is the spring stiffness.

    All springs need not behave linearly. suppose a spring behaves non linearly
    What is the theory that calculates the deflection for a non linear spring when
    a force f is applied.

    Basically i believe non linear finite element analysis is based on this non linear
    spring theory.

    in a non linear spring f will not be proportional to x but may be proportional to
    square of x or cube of x or some power of x.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. May 14, 2005 #2
    Just a guess, but F=kx.

    if it is non linear then if you say x^2, then F=kx^2, or in general, F=k*f(x).
    Even more generally, K may also vary as a function of x, so then you will have F=g(x)f(x), where g(x) is the spring constant at various positions.

    But idealy, the whole POINT of a GOOD spring is that it IS LINEAR. if it is not linear then the spring probably isint worth using in the first place.

    Edit: I assumed that F=k*f(x); however, if it is nonlinear, then the relationship between force and displacement would have to be determined experimentally. It may work out that it is directly proportional to x, or it may work out to be inversely proportional. But I suppose by generalizing with f(x) it takes care of that problem, because if it were inversely proportional f(x) might be 1/x, etc.
     
    Last edited: May 14, 2005
  4. May 14, 2005 #3
    I think he means physically non-linear spring, I dont know, its not making much sense to me. If a spring doesnt deform linearly then however it deforms would be its force equation like cyrus said
     
  5. May 14, 2005 #4

    Pyrrhus

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    Materials go under different phases until they break, they start in the proportional face when there is a proportional limit which could be equal to its elastic limit, but not necessarily as can be seen in materials such as rubber, after than the materials go to the fluency phase (Plasticity), when they deform easily without mush stress applied, then finally the material recombines to make itself stronger against the stress and goes into the estriction phase where a stress of a bigger magnitude will end up in the material being broken. These depends on the characteristics of the materials.

    Hooke's Law

    [tex] \sigma = E \epsilon [/tex]

    Stress = Elasticity Module * Axial Unitary Deformation, which can be rewriten as F = kx. This law only applies for linear elastic materials. This means the proportional limit is the same as the elastic limit in the materials. This is very important in engineering because most materials are linear elastic.

    Materials that have nonlinear elasticity can bend in more than one way under stress or can take different forms before they get back to their original way. Mostly this require equations which can give more than one answer.

    Here is a paper about NonLinear Elasticity

    http://www.math.siu.edu/spector/fracture.pdf
     
  6. May 14, 2005 #5
    I would like to point out that we will not get oscillatory behavior if we leave off minus signs or use even powers of x. Only odd powers of x, and odd functions in general, will produce an oscillatory solution.
     
  7. May 15, 2005 #6

    Claude Bile

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    In the most general case, a non-linear restoring force will be a power series of x. The restoring force will depend on the physical characteristics of the spring. To find the restoring force, you would need to determine the coefficients of the power series. (Experimentally, I would imagine).

    An interesting parallel to this sceanrio is that of non-linear optics. In non-linear optics, the polarisation is no longer proportional to the applied electric field, i.e. instead of;

    [tex] \vec{P}=\epsilon_0\chi\vec{E} [/tex]

    The polarisation is described by;

    [tex] \vec{P}=\epsilon_0\chi_1\vec{E}+\chi_2\vec{E}^2+\chi_3\vec{E}^3+....[/tex]

    Where [tex] \chi_n [/tex] denotes the polarisability tensors of the nth order. The inclusion of these terms in the wave equation gives rise to new frequencies being generated, including new harmonics. For materials with a symmetric atomic restoring force, all the even orders are zero.

    Odd functions give rise to symmetric restoring potentials, asymmetric restoring potentials, such as those obtained when even powers of x are included. Asymmetric potentials can still yield oscillatory solutions.



    Claude.
     
  8. Jun 15, 2010 #7
    A member that behaves as a nonlinear spring would have a stiffness that varies with x. The formula relating force to displacement is pretty much the same: F=k(x)x. you will of course need to know how k varies with x.
     
  9. Jun 22, 2010 #8
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Non linear spring derivation
  1. Non linear fea (Replies: 3)

  2. Non-linear optics (Replies: 2)

  3. Non-linear oscillator (Replies: 2)

Loading...