Hi,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Complicated stats question, but maybe someone out there knows how to proceed. I am trying to perform regression on two variables, the samples of which have significant, but known error components. Ordinary least squares regression cannot be used as it is assumed that measurements are made without error. As I understand it, the normal way to proceed would be to assume a maximum likelihood functional relationship (MLFR) and use some of the widely available iterative algorithms. However, in order to ensure even sample distrubution (i.e. not skewed) and homo-scedasticity I performed logarithmic transforms on both variables. As a consequence the sample errors are log-normal. standard MLFR techniques assume normal error distributions. Is there any way of dealing with this problem. Specifically, is anyone aware freeware computer programs that would allow one to estimate parameter values and confidence intervals.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Non-normal measurement error in linear regression

Loading...

Similar Threads for normal measurement error | Date |
---|---|

A Sum of independent random variables and Normalization | Thursday at 11:54 AM |

I Data from Normal D is Uncorrelated? | Aug 26, 2017 |

I How to select a normalization method? | May 19, 2017 |

PDF of distance between measured coordinates with normally distr. errors | May 15, 2010 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**