Non planar simplicial homology?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Coolphreak
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
In the discussion on non-planar simplicial homology, participants explore the implications of computing homology groups for a complex defined in a 2D plane but existing in 3D space. The first homology group, H_1, can be computed accurately despite the complex's non-planar nature, as the definition of homology does not depend on the embedding in an ambient space. The presence of self-intersecting edges does not affect the computation of H_1, provided the chains are of the correct dimension. The second homology group, H_2, is also considered, but the focus remains on the validity of H_1 calculations in this context. Overall, the discussion emphasizes that homology theory is robust against the complexities of spatial embedding.
Coolphreak
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
Let's say I have a complex like this:
http://img267.imageshack.us/img267/5606/nonplanarpfum9.th.png

The original nodes are defined on the same plane, but the actual complex exists in 3 dimensions. If I want to find holes in the complex, would computing the 1st homology group work in this non planar case? There are 3 "holes" in this complex. Would computing the 2nd homology group work? However, I do not have any 3D components, just 2D components embedded in 3 space.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
A simplicial complex is a set of simplices. The embedding of it into some space is immaterial (or it wouldn't be a very good homology theory). Just work out H_1.
 
Last edited:
so even with self intersecting edges (non planar graphs), the first homology group can be correctly computed no matter the embedding dimension? As long as the chains are of the correct dimension?
 
Does the definition of homology have anything to do with its embedding in an ambient space? No. There is absolutely nothing in the definition that even takes this into account. It is the quotient space of the kernel of one map by the image of another.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top