- #1
tribdog
- 769
- 17
If names like John and Paul etc are considered biblical names how come no one who lives in that region now has those names?
tribdog said:If names like John and Paul etc are considered biblical names how come no one who lives in that region now has those names?
tribdog said:So if the names have been westernized how are they still biblical names? Names shouldn't be translated as far as I'm concerned. Ever since I met a girl named Lasagna, I realized it doesn't matter what your name is and however you pronounce your name is the right way.
TVP45 said:Are you by chance reading an English translation? Remember you're talking about Jews; look up the names in Hebrew. Paul for example is (I can't do all the accent marks, so this isn't quite right) Sa' ul.
Are you saying that the English equivalent of a Biblical name is not itself a Biblical name? That 's rather pedantic don't you think? Would you say that an English translation of the Bible is not a Bible?tribdog said:If names like John and Paul etc are considered biblical names how come no one who lives in that region now has those names?
tribdog said:So if the names have been westernized how are they still biblical names? Names shouldn't be translated as far as I'm concerned. Ever since I met a girl named Lasagna, I realized it doesn't matter what your name is and however you pronounce your name is the right way.
Yeap, and Jesus was translated into Peter Forsberg...f95toli said:There are many different "versions" of those names. When the bible was translated to new languages they also translated the names.
E.g. John=Johannes in Swedish (including in the Swedish bible)
Paul=Paulus (i.e. from latin)
Mark=Markus
and so on...
mgb_phys said:But Saul was his name when he was a bad (=Jewish) person, when he became a good (=Latin) person his name was Paul.
That's how you can tell bad people - they have names that are different!
mgb_phys said:But Saul was his name when he was a bad (=Jewish) person, when he became a good (=Latin) person his name was Paul.
That's how you can tell bad people - they have names that are different!
"lost sinner" / "heretic who must be killed" = ToMAHto / ToMAYtoI think it is "lost sinner" not "bad people"...
Took me a few seconds - but brilliant!Strange words from someone whose name was Bugatti55_phys before he Anglicized it
EL said:Yeap, and Jesus was translated into Peter Forsberg...
tribdog said:If names like John and Paul etc are considered biblical names how come no one who lives in that region now has those names?
Studying the Bible is not only beneficial for religious purposes, but it also offers valuable insights into history, literature, and cultural traditions. It provides a deeper understanding of the beliefs and values that have influenced society throughout history.
Yes, the Bible contains many teachings and stories that can be applied to everyday life, regardless of one's religious beliefs. It offers lessons on morality, ethics, and wisdom that can be valuable to anyone seeking personal growth and development.
The Bible is primarily associated with Christianity, but it is considered a sacred text in other religions as well, such as Judaism and Islam. Many of the stories and teachings in the Bible are also found in other religious texts, making it a valuable source of knowledge for people of different faiths.
As with any ancient text, there may be inconsistencies or discrepancies in the Bible. However, many biblical stories and events have been historically verified through archaeological evidence. It is important to approach the Bible with an understanding of its cultural and historical context.
Yes, the interpretation of the Bible can vary greatly depending on one's beliefs and perspective. Non-religious individuals may approach the text with a more critical or analytical lens, while religious individuals may view it as divinely inspired. Ultimately, the interpretation of the Bible is a personal and subjective experience.