Non-Riemannian Geommetry ?

394
0
Non-Riemannian Geommetry ??

in Riemann Geommetry one needs a metric to define a distance so

[tex] ds^{2}= g_{i,j}dx^{i}dx^{j} [/tex] is a Bilinear form

the idea is can this be generalized to a non-metric Geommetry ? i mean, you define the distance via a function F so

[tex] ds^{2}= F(x_{i} , x_{j},dx_í} , dx_{j} ) [/tex]

so this time we do not have a Bilinear form or we do not have or depend on a metric [tex] g_{i,j} [/tex] is this the Non-Riemannian Geommetry ??
 

quasar987

Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
4,771
7
Re: Non-Riemannian Geommetry ??

The only example I know is Finsler geometry.
 

Ben Niehoff

Science Advisor
Gold Member
1,864
159
Re: Non-Riemannian Geommetry ??

The word "Riemannian" also usually implies that the quadratic form g is positive definite. Then Lorentz metrics constitute "non-Riemannian" geometry, but since changing the signature is not too big of a change, usually we just say "pseudo-Riemannian".

As Quasar mentions, Finsler geometry is another option. Finsler geometry is to Riemannian geometry as Banach space is to Hilbert space. That is, in Finsler geometry, you define a norm, but not an inner product. The norm satisfies the triangle inequality, but there is no notion of angles. There are some other properties that I can't remember.
 

Related Threads for: Non-Riemannian Geommetry ?

  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
740
Top