In BCS you make the assumption that the effective electron-electron interaction is constant within a small shell around the fermi surface and zero otherwise. From this you get a constant spherical gap.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

In non s-wave SC there is a specific form for the gap ie, [tex]\Delta_0 = [ \cos (k_x a) - \cos (k_y a)] [/tex]. I know that you can calculate the gap parameter using group theory and the underlying symmetry of the crystal lattice. But is there a way to choose an arbitary form for [tex] k \cdot k^\prime[/tex], self consistently solve the gap equation and arrive at a d-wave gap or any other non s-wave gap?

How do you choose the effective electron-electron interaction? Is it based on the atomic orbitals that are believed to be responsible for SC? I've done a few searches and all I find is a assumption for the form of the gap. Thanks

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Non s-wave superconductivity

Loading...

Similar Threads for wave superconductivity | Date |
---|---|

A Nambu Spinor Notation in Kitaev spinless p-wave model | Feb 27, 2017 |

D-wave superconductivity: Functional forms? | Mar 31, 2014 |

Superconducting d-wave dispersion | Aug 23, 2010 |

P-wave superconductivity | Mar 24, 2010 |

Superconductivity: difference between s-wave and d-wave | Dec 16, 2009 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**