Non-singularity of A^T*A

  • #1
IniquiTrance
190
0
Is it true to say that if [itex]X^T X[/itex] is non-singular, then the column vectors of X must be linearly independent? I know how to prove that if the columns of X are linearly independent, then [itex]X^T X[/itex] is non-singular. Just not sure about the other way around. Thanks!
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
rasmhop
430
3
Is X a square matrix? If so use
[tex]det(X^TX) = det(X)^2=0[/tex]

If not X is not square, but is real, then QR decomposition should reduce the problem to that of square matrices (something simpler may suffice, but this is the simplest approach I can think of right now).
 
  • #3
AlephZero
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
7,025
297
Prove it by contradition. If the columns of X are linearly dependent, there is a non-zero vector ##y## such that ##X^TXy = 0##.
 
  • #4
IniquiTrance
190
0
Thank you. I suspected it was true, but couldn't prove it to myself.
 
  • #5
Dickfore
2,988
5
Prove it by contradition. If the columns of X are linearly dependent, there is a non-zero vector ##y## such that ##X^TXy = 0##.

That's a very nice proof, especially because you established necessary and sufficient conditions. The OP claimed that he could prove the converse, but, if he knew this proof he should have had no trouble.

Just one remark, instead of "contradiction", maybe you should have used "contraposition".
 
  • #6
AlephZero
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
7,025
297
Just one remark, instead of "contradiction", maybe you should have used "contraposition".

Well, I used to know what "contrapositive" meant when I was a student, but these days I find understanding the concepts is more useful than remembering their names.
 

Suggested for: Non-singularity of A^T*A

Replies
13
Views
520
Replies
7
Views
144
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
604
Replies
1
Views
671
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
810
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
430
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
1K
Top