Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Normal Distribution Quick Q

  1. Oct 17, 2010 #1
    I am a bit confused with the notation, Whenever I see N(mu,alpha) does that mean the data set is normal and does it also mean that it's standard normal?

    Is there a difference between using Z~N(mu,alpha) vs. X~N(mu,alpha)? does the Z indicate standard normal?, if so why don't we just use Z(mu,alpha)?

    Can I still use this notation N(_,_) when the data set is NOT normal?

    Last edited: Oct 18, 2010
  2. jcsd
  3. Oct 17, 2010 #2


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Standard notation: X~N(m,d) means X is a random variable, with a normal distribution having a mean m and standard deviation d. If you wrote Z(m,d) then you need to define Z. N(m,d) means the distribution is normal - you can't use it for something else - it is a matter of notation.

    If d is unknown for a normal distribution with a known m, then, as you observed, you can specify the midpoint of the distribution, but nothing else.
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Similar Discussions: Normal Distribution Quick Q
  1. Normal distribution (Replies: 1)

  2. Normal distribution (Replies: 7)

  3. Normal distribution (Replies: 7)

  4. Normal Distribution (Replies: 4)

  5. Normal distribution (Replies: 3)