- #1

- 1,620

- 187

_{n}=½+iT of the Riemann zeta function and the next γ

_{n+1}on the critical strip Re(z)= ½ is

the non-normalized interval length L= (γ

_{n+1}- γ

_{n}) times (ln(z/(2π)))/(2π)) .(*)

Also in the intro it says that it is normalized by

multiplying L times 2π /ln(T). (**)

My questions are very elementary so that I can get started on understanding this; it is not a question about the conjecture or the RH per se.

[1] I am not sure what the normalization is supposed to do: make every interval

0<normalized length

__<__1 ?

[2] I seem to have missed something in the difference between (*) and (**):

they are multiplying by two different factors, one of which is almost the reciprocal of the other. So, why the reciprocal if they want to do the same thing, and one that is answered, why almost the reciprocal (difference of a factor of 2π in the argument of the log)?

[3] Where does this expression come from: both intuitively and mathematically? It looks vaguely like an inverse of the normal function, but not quite.

[4] In the intro the author characterizes this informally as an "average" spacing. Average of what? All spacings between zeros? I am not sure how to match up this "average" with the given formulas.

Thanks.