The normalized differential quantum-field-theoretic probability ##dP## of scattering is given by(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

##dP=\frac{|\langle f |S|i\rangle|^{2}}{\langle f|f\rangle\langle i|i\rangle}d\Pi,##

where ##|i\rangle## is the initial state, ##|f\rangle## is the final state, ##\langle f|S|i\rangle## are the elements (in the basis of the ##|i\rangle## and ##|f\rangle## states) of the ##S##-matrix and ##d\Pi## is the region of final state momenta at which we are looking.

The goal of this post is to investigate the normalization of ##dP## and the form of the region ##d\Pi## of final state momenta.

The ##\langle f | f \rangle## and ##\langle i | i \rangle## in the denominator come from the fact that the one-particle states, defined at fixed time, may not be normalized to ##\langle f | f \rangle = \langle i | i \rangle = 1##. In fact, such a convention would not be Lorentz invariant.

Also, there are two constraints on the form of ##d\Pi##:

1. ##d\Pi## must be proportional to the product of the differential momentum, ##d^{3}p_{j}##, of each final state.

2. ##d\Pi## must integrate to ##1##.

Therefore, ##d\Pi## must be of the form

####d\Pi=\prod\limits_{j}\frac{V}{(2\pi)^{3}}d^{3}p_{j}.####

My Question:

1. I understand that ##\langle p | p \rangle = (2\pi)^{3}(2\omega_{p})\delta^{3}(0)## so that ##\langle p | p \rangle \neq 1##. But why does the fact that ##|p\rangle## is not unit-normalized mean that ##\langle f | f \rangle## and ##\langle i | i \rangle## must be in the denominator of the formula for ##dP##?

1. In order for ##\int d\Pi = 1##, I notice that##\int \frac{dp}{2\pi}=\frac{1}{L}##viadimensional analysisanda ##2\pi## convention. Can you please explain how dimensional analysis and a ##2\pi## convention lead us to ##\int \frac{dp}{2\pi}=\frac{1}{L}##? Is this a heuristic derivation?

2. The normalization ##\int d\Pi = 1## is also thenatural continuum limitof havingdiscrete points ##x_{i}=\frac{i}{N}L##andwavenumbers ##p_{i}=\frac{2\pi}{L}\frac{i}{N}## with ##i=1, \dots , N##. Can you please explain in detail?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# A Normalized Differential Scattering Probability

Have something to add?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads - Normalized Differential Scattering | Date |
---|---|

A Models in QM | Feb 12, 2018 |

A Defining Krauss operators with normal distribution | Jan 22, 2018 |

A Normalization of 4x4 matrix | Dec 14, 2017 |

A Srednicki's normalization choice for lie algebra generators | Jul 9, 2017 |

I Constraints on potential for normalizable wavefunction | Apr 10, 2017 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**