1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Not so simple harmonic motion

  1. Oct 17, 2006 #1
    OK, the answer for this problem seems a bit high to me, so I'm going to ask if it all seems alright.

    You have a 1m rod of no mass, fixed so that it may rotate about it's center. At the top of the rod is a mass m1 (0.5kg), and the bottom is a mass m2 (1.0kg). Find the angular frequency assuming a small amplitude of oscillations.

    I just stared at it for about an hour, trying to find a way to get it into the form

    [tex]\ddot{\psi} + \omega_0 ^2 \psi = 0[/tex]

    Eventually i went at it with torques, using the [tex]\tau = r x F[/tex] forumla.


    [tex] \tau = rm_1g \sin (180- \theta) - rm_2g \sin (\theta) [/tex]

    and using small angle approximation, both sins go to theta.

    [tex] \tau = rg (m_2 - m_1) \theta [/tex]
    [tex] \tau = I \ddot{\theta} = -rg (m_2 - m_1) \theta [/tex]
    [tex] I = \sum m r^2 = (m_1 + m_2) r^2 [/tex]

    [tex] \ddot{\theta} = \frac{-rg (m_2 - m_1)}{r^2 (m_1+m_2)}[/tex]
    [tex] \ddot{\theta} + \frac{rg (m_2 - m_1)}{r^2 (m_1+m_2)} = 0 [/tex]

    Which is in the right form. Meaning that the frequency is:
    [tex] \omega_0 = \sqrt{\frac{g(m_2-m_1)}{r(m_1+m_2)}} [/tex]

    Now, that may be ALL wrong, but it's what first came to mind. I end up with 2.6Hz for an answer which seems a bit off...

    Thanks for any redirections/confirmations/help you can give!

    (if the tex is messy i'm working on it still!)
    Last edited: Oct 17, 2006
  2. jcsd
  3. Oct 17, 2006 #2


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    You could check your answer using the standard physical pendulum equation


    You already have an expression for I, and the mass and g are easy. You just need to compute the distance from support to CM. I think you will like it. I did not check your computation, but the answer looks good.
  4. Oct 17, 2006 #3
    excellant! what a helpful script! The answer does end up being the same, so I'm going to assume my theory-work was good. It's not EXACTLY how we;ve been doing those questions (been using energies and such) but I found this one much easier to follow.

    Thanks a lot! (still open for comments though)
  5. Oct 17, 2006 #4


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Well, if you look at the first part of the link, you wil find your

    [tex]\ddot{\psi} + \omega_0 ^2 \psi = 0[/tex]

    Just replace their variable with yours
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?

Similar Discussions: Not so simple harmonic motion
  1. Simple Harmonic Motion (Replies: 3)

  2. Simple Harmonic Motion (Replies: 2)

  3. Simple harmonic motion (Replies: 4)

  4. Simple Harmonic Motion (Replies: 3)