1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Notation question

  1. Feb 7, 2008 #1
    My book uses this certain notation, but doesn't seem to explain it. It's probably something that I should already know...

    Bill and George (Noice!) go target shooting at each other. Both shoot at the target at the same time. Bill hits target with prob 0.7 and G independently hits target with prob 0.4.

    (a) Given that exactly one shot hit the target, what is the prob it was G's shot?

    [sol]

    P{G|exactly 1 hit} = P{G, not Bill}/ P(exactly 1 hit}

    = P{G, B'}/(P{G,B'} + P{B,G'})

    = [tex]\frac{P(G)P(B^{c})}{(P(G)P(B^{c}) + P(B)P(G^{c})}[/tex]

    I think the reason I don't follow is a notation thing. Can I treat the P{G, not Bill} as P(G[tex]\wedge[/tex]B[tex]^{c}[/tex])? If that's the case then it makes perfect sense as the events are independent.

    (b) Given that the target was hit, what's the probability it was G's shot?

    P(G|H) = P(G)/P(H)

    where

    P(H) = 1- P(no hit) = 1 - (P(G')P(B'))

    Why is it not P(G|H) = P(G)/P(G)P(B) ?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Feb 7, 2008 #2

    EnumaElish

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    P{G, not Bill} = P(G and B') is correct.

    I don't understand your last question.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Notation question
  1. Notation question (Replies: 2)

  2. Question on notation (Replies: 4)

Loading...