1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

NSD Fusion GmbH?

  1. May 16, 2007 #1

    mheslep

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Can anyone expound on product/design approach of the neutron-generator company NSD-Fusion GmbH?
    http://www.nsd-fusion.com/core-tech.php

    I'm guessing this is a spin off of the attempt by Daimler-Chrysler & G. Miley to build inertial electrostatic based N generators a few years back. Here they list N flux at 10^8 N/sec w/ D-T fusion:
    http://www.nsd-fusion.com/14mev.php
    I'm recalling from somewhere that the Daimler-C people thought one needed ~10^12 N/sec (~1 Watt) to make a commercially viable device, and it probably needed to be D-D.

    AFAICT, of all the N gen. firms - Schlumberger, BakerHughes, Thermo Scientific, - NSD Fusion is the only one attempting a go w/ a renewable, accelerator based fusion scheme.

    Any comments? My particular interest is in explosives detection.

    Mark
     
  2. jcsd
  3. May 16, 2007 #2

    Astronuc

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Looks like an IEC - in cylindrical geometry - as opposed to a 'fusor' in spherical geometry.

    Basically a [fast] neutron source for neutron radiography, or if thermalized, for neutron activation analysis.

    D-D systems produced a lower level of 14 MeV n's, and one doesn't have to worry so much about T, although the D-D reaction produces T + p in ~50% of the reactions, and the T will more likely react with a D than D-D for a given energy.

    D+D has a much lower reaction rate parameter the D+T, by almost 2 orders of magnitude at T ~ 50-70 keV, D+T would provide a greater neutron yield at lower energy input.
     
  4. May 16, 2007 #3

    mheslep

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Yes. T would also add cost/complexity for a commercial product: T is controlled, licensed & therefore expensive; D is not.

    Mark
     
  5. May 17, 2007 #4

    Astronuc

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    But if one wants 14.1 MeV neutrons, one must use D+T. Also, D+T has been historically used in 'neutron-howitzers'. The deuterons are accelerated into a tritiated source (metal hydride).
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: NSD Fusion GmbH?
  1. Fusion for students (Replies: 4)

  2. Fission or fusions? (Replies: 1)

  3. Questions on Fusion (Replies: 28)

  4. Fusion or Fission? (Replies: 16)

  5. Fusion power (Replies: 2)

Loading...