Can Someone Explain How Nuclear Fuel Rods Heat Water in a Reactor?

In summary, the heat in a nuclear reactor is mainly produced from the thermal energy deposited in the fuel, which is conducted through the cladding and into the coolant. This energy comes from various sources such as neutron interactions, fission product decay, and gamma rays. The total amount of power generated in a reactor is limited by the safe removal of this energy. The root source of this energy is the release of additional binding energy during fission, in which the fission products are more tightly bound and weigh less than the original nucleus. This follows the principle of mass-energy equivalence (E=mc^2).
  • #1
Jimmy87
686
17
Hi,

I haven't studied much nuclear physics and would be very grateful if someone could answer a few basic questions I had about fission in the fuel rods on how the water is actually heated in the reactor core:

1) I don't know if I have this correct but is it that the way the water is heated in a reactor is that the kinetic energy of the neutrons released from a fission event are transferred to the water molecules (obviously the ones that don't go on to cause more fissions). Is this mainly how the water is heated or are there other energy transfers e.g. energy transferred by gamma/beta particles that also come out of the fission events?

2) Wiki says that the fuel is surrounded by zirconium cladding. I take it that this means if the above is correct then the neutrons will pass through the cladding without being absorbed (otherwise they couldn't interact with the water molecules)? Or does the water heat up because the fission particles collide with the cladding making the rods very hot so the water is heated like a filament in a kettle type effect?

Thanks for any insight offered!
 
  • Like
Likes Y3r3x
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
Some heating is as you described. But the reactor fuel itself gets very hot - from neutrons, gamma, beta, and direct impulse to the decay products. The fuel will then heat the cladding and water.
 
  • Like
Likes Y3r3x
  • #3
The fission reactions occur in the fuel, and that is where the bulk of the thermal energy is deposited. That thermal energy is conducted from the fuel, through the cladding into the coolant. In LWRs, the cladding is a Zr-alloy. Some fraction of the heat (~2.3 to 3.5%) is generated by gamma radiation interacting with the cladding, coolant and structural alloys in the core.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes geoelectronics and Y3r3x
  • #4
Most of the energy (~82%) from a fission becomes kinetic energy of the fission products, which causes the fuel to heat up. The heat in the fuel is conducted through the fuel, through the clad, and into the coolant.
Fission product decay produces an additional amount of energy (~7.3%) that is deposited directly into the fuel.

There is also additional energy produced from prompt gamma rays (~3.4%), neutron slowing down (~2.4%), and capture gamma rays (~4.9%). This energy may be deposited in other locations. The neutron slowing down energy is deposited directly in the coolant. The energy from prompt gamma rays and capture gamma rays may be deposited in the fuel or other structural material.

The total amount of power from a reactor is limited by the amount of energy that can be safely removed from the fuel.
 
  • #5
rpp said:
Most of the energy (~82%) from a fission becomes kinetic energy of the fission products, which causes the fuel to heat up. The heat in the fuel is conducted through the fuel, through the clad, and into the coolant.
Fission product decay produces an additional amount of energy (~7.3%) that is deposited directly into the fuel.

There is also additional energy produced from prompt gamma rays (~3.4%), neutron slowing down (~2.4%), and capture gamma rays (~4.9%). This energy may be deposited in other locations. The neutron slowing down energy is deposited directly in the coolant. The energy from prompt gamma rays and capture gamma rays may be deposited in the fuel or other structural material.

The total amount of power from a reactor is limited by the amount of energy that can be safely removed from the fuel.
Would you please comment on the root source of the energy released by fission? Is it mass deficit converting to energy? Does it follow E=mc^2?

thanks. Geo
 

Attachments

  • 1566310042269.png
    1566310042269.png
    84 bytes · Views: 290
  • 1566310084186.png
    1566310084186.png
    84 bytes · Views: 283
  • #6
geoelectronics said:
the root source of the energy released by fission?

It's the release of energy due to an exothermic reaction. In this case the reaction is nuclear instead of chemical, but the principle is the same.

geoelectronics said:
Is it mass deficit converting to energy?

It's additional binding energy being released; the fission products are more tightly bound, so the fission process releases energy.

geoelectronics said:
Does it follow E=mc^2?

##E = mc^2## is just a unit conversion equation between mass units and energy units.
 
  • #7
PeterDonis said:
It's the release of energy due to an exothermic reaction. In this case the reaction is nuclear instead of chemical, but the principle is the same.
It's additional binding energy being released; the fission products are more tightly bound, so the fission process releases energy.
##E = mc^2## is just a unit conversion equation between mass units and energy units.
Thank you.
So the tightly bound, massive nucleus undergoes fission (either induced or spontaneous SF), the nucleons are separated, thus weighing more than the did when bound (correct?) and the difference in that weight is the source of energy? So in E=mc^2 in the frame of fission, the m=mass which really just means mass-energy equivalence, is this correct?

Geo
 
  • #8
geoelectronics said:
So the tightly bound, massive nucleus undergoes fission (either induced or spontaneous SF), the nucleons are separated, thus weighing more than the did when bound (correct?) and the difference in that weight is the source of energy?

No, you have it backwards. The weight of the fission products is less than the weight of the original nucleus. The fission products are more tightly bound. That's why fission releases energy. If the fission products weighed more, fission would require an input of energy; it would not release energy.
 
  • #9
PeterDonis said:
No, you have it backwards. The weight of the fission products is less than the weight of the original nucleus. The fission products are more tightly bound. That's why fission releases energy. If the fission products weighed more, fission would require an input of energy; it would not release energy.
That makes sense. Thank you. If the nucleons were separated totally and not bound in another, lighter set of nuclei would those free nucleons (protons, neutrons) weigh more or less than the original massive nucleus?

Thanks
Geo
 
Last edited:
  • #10
geoelectronics said:
If the nucleons were separated totally and not bound in another, lighter set of nuclei would those free nucleons (protons, neutrons) weigh more or less than the original massive nucleus?

More. That's what binding energy means.
 
  • Like
Likes geoelectronics
  • #11
PeterDonis said:
More. That's what binding energy means.
Got it.
Thanks. I was truly thinking backwards, because of the missing negative sign.
Geo
-30-
 

1. How do nuclear fuel rods heat water in a reactor?

Nuclear fuel rods contain pellets of enriched uranium, which undergo a process called nuclear fission. During this process, the atoms of uranium split, releasing a large amount of heat energy. This heat energy is used to heat water in the reactor, which then produces steam to turn turbines and generate electricity.

2. How does the heat from nuclear fuel rods transfer to the water?

The heat from nuclear fuel rods is transferred to the water through a heat exchanger. This is a system of pipes that run through the reactor core and are filled with water. As the fuel rods heat up, the water in the pipes also heats up, and the heat is transferred to the rest of the water in the reactor.

3. How is the temperature of the water controlled in a nuclear reactor?

The temperature of the water in a nuclear reactor is controlled by regulating the flow of coolant. The coolant is a substance, usually water, that is circulated through the reactor core to absorb heat and carry it away. By adjusting the flow rate of the coolant, the temperature of the water can be controlled.

4. What happens to the nuclear fuel rods after they have been used?

After the nuclear fuel rods have been used, they are considered to be spent fuel. They are removed from the reactor and stored in a pool of water to cool down. After several years, the spent fuel can be reprocessed to extract any remaining usable fuel, or it can be safely disposed of in a storage facility.

5. Are nuclear fuel rods dangerous?

Nuclear fuel rods are highly radioactive and can be dangerous if handled improperly. However, they are designed to be contained within the reactor and are not a hazard to the environment or public unless there is a malfunction or accident. Proper safety protocols and regulations are in place to ensure the safe handling and disposal of nuclear fuel rods.

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
168
  • Nuclear Engineering
2
Replies
46
Views
12K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Back
Top