Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Nuclear fusion in matter

  1. Sep 26, 2008 #1

    I don't know if this is the right place to post.

    Anyway, the fact is this:


    already published on Instrument and nuclear method B



    already published on Physica C

    The conclusion is that there is a difference between nuclear fusion in vacuum and nuclear fusion in matter.

    What do you think about it ?
  2. jcsd
  3. Sep 26, 2008 #2


    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    I think what one means is the difference between fusion in a plasma vs in a solid.

    One has to compare energy densities and reaction rates if one is looking at which is more practical.
  4. Sep 26, 2008 #3
    Maybe the difference is between fusion in gas target (trying to reproduce stars behavior in lab where high vacuum condition are applied) and in a solid target.

    Anyway, in this article the fusion ratio depends on target material.
    And I think this is the crucial point.

    I have always known that the electrons dynamics is so slow (I mean typical time decay) compared to that of nuclei that the lattice presence has no effect.

    But this article says exactly the contrary.
    Last edited: Sep 26, 2008
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?

Similar Discussions: Nuclear fusion in matter
  1. Nuclear fusion (Replies: 7)

  2. Nuclear fusion (Replies: 1)