Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Null points between galaxies

  1. Apr 3, 2007 #1


    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Are there large scale lagrange points between gravitationaly bound galaxies?
    ie a small galaxy that orbits a larger one, or even points where gravity is null
    between near large bodies
    Last edited: Apr 3, 2007
  2. jcsd
  3. Apr 3, 2007 #2
    Lagrange's calculation is based on very general (but also very specialized) mathematics, in particular the Newtonian two body problem. So yes, there should be the same old 5 lagrangian points for the Milky Way and the Andromeda galaxy, since they are a reasonably good approximation to a two body system. Similarly for any other more or less isolated binary galaxies. Also true at even larger scales if you can find binary galaxy clusters or even bound binary superclusters. (I'm not aware of any, but that doesn't mean they don't exist.) Probably even more similar points exist in three and more body systems, but this is much more complex mathematics and I am not aware of any general results.
    Best, Jim
  4. Apr 3, 2007 #3


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Lagrange points rely on two assumptions. The first is that the bodies are point particles or spherical, since the external gravitational field of a spherical object is the same as the field or a point particle of the same mass. The second is that the objects are in orbit around a common centre of mass.

    The first probably dosn't apply to these galaxies, and the second doesn't either. They are on a collision course rather than an orbit. If you look at the main image inhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagrange_points" [Broken] link you will see that Lagrange points 2-5 really on the fact that the bodies are in circular motion around the common centre of mass. This dosn't apply in this case. Lagrange point 1 may exist, however since the galaxies are not points or spheres it probably will not be a point be more of an extended region of low potential, rather than a definite trough.
    Last edited by a moderator: May 2, 2017
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook