Here's something else about sets I'm trying to get right. The empty set is a set that contains nothing, written as [tex]\phi[/tex] = {}. It's called an empty set, so it is a set. Every set contains the empty set, right? Is there such a notion as an empty element? That doesn't sound right to me.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Normally we distinguish between an element and the set containing that single element, correct? But if the empty set is nothing (or the set that contains nothing) then the set {[tex]\phi[/tex]} = {} = [tex]\phi[/tex]. Is it proper to say that the empty set and it's power sets are the same? What would that make the cardinality of the empty set, simply zero?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Null set question

Loading...

Similar Threads - Null question | Date |
---|---|

I Question about simplifying Sigma notation | Feb 11, 2018 |

I Is this null hypothesis wrong? | Feb 28, 2017 |

I Level of significance and acceptance and rejection of the null hypothesis | Feb 8, 2017 |

I Understanding the null hypothesis | Feb 8, 2017 |

I Rejecting a null hypothesis without a z-score or p-value? | May 13, 2016 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**