Null space and 3x3 matrix

In summary, the student is trying to solve for the unknown value of x in a system where the known values are a vector X and a vector C. The student is in disagreement with the book and it is not a null space problem, it is a system where the unknown is a vector C and known parameters are a vector X. The student is trying to solve for the unknown value of x in a system where the known values are a vector X and a vector C. The student is in disagreement with the book and it is not a null space problem, it is a system where the unknown is a vector C and known parameters are a vector X. The student is trying to solve for the unknown value of x in a system where the
  • #1
robertjford80
388
0

Homework Statement



Screenshot2012-05-12at25500AM.png


Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



I don't understand how they get the numbers on the right. This is a null space problem so the 3x3 matrix = 0. By my reckoning

(1/3)x3 = 0 so x3 = 0. So then I try the second row.

2x3 = (3/2)x2

Divide both sides by two and x2 = 3/4

Plug that into the first row and we have

2x1 - 3 [(3/4)x3] - 2x3 = 0

Simplify

x1 = (11/8)x3

It's now clear that I'm in disagreement with the book.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
It's not a null space problem, it's a system where the unknown is a vector C and known parameters are a vector X.
In other words they are solving [tex]\textbf{AC=X}[/tex]
 
  • #3
well, i still don't know how they got the numbers on the right.
 
  • #4
They just performed Gauss moves about the rows.

First step is: R2 -> R2-(1/2) R1
Second step: R3 -> R3+(2/3) R2

They're doing very simple calculations, you are probably missing the point here, I can't get your confusion.
Which is then the final purpose of this system, it's before on your textbook.
 
  • #5
I understand how they get

[2 -3 -2]
[0 -3/2 2]
[0 0 1/3]

I do not understand how they get

x1
-.5x1 + x2
-.33x1 + .672 + x3
 
  • #6
The first matrix in your problem is an augmented matrix. You should have been able to recognize its form. This means the original form of the matrix is: [itex]AC=X[/itex] where the matrix C is 3x1: (c1, c2, c3)^T, and the matrix X is another 3x1: (x1, x2, x3)^T.
 
  • #7
hold on
 
  • #8
After you have reduced the augmented matrix to its triangular form, write it again into its separate matrices [itex]UC=X'[/itex]. Then, try matrix multiplication on the left-hand side. Finally, equate both sides.

Note: [itex]UC=X'[/itex] is in similar form to the original [itex]AC=X[/itex] but after reducing the augmented matrix, [itex]A|X[/itex], then [itex]U[/itex] simply represents the upper echelon form of the original matrix [itex]A[/itex]. Likewise, [itex]X'[/itex] represents the elements of the matrix ##X## after row reduction.
 
Last edited:
  • #9
I tried multiplying

[2 -3 -2]
[0 -1.5 2]
[0 0 .33]

by the original matrix and I got

[1 1 5]
[-1.5 6.5 -3.5]
[0 .33 -.33]

Not the right answer. The I tried multiplying

[2 -3 -2]
[0 -1.5 2]
[0 0 .33]

by

[1 0 0]
[-.5 1 0]
[-.33 .67 1]

And I got approximately

[4 -4 -2]
[.1 -.1 2]
[-.1 .2 .33]

I also tried A = LU decomposition and that yielded no results similar to the book.
 
  • #10
[tex]U\times C=
\displaystyle\left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}
2&-3&-2 \\
0&-3/2&2 \\
0&0&1/3 \\
\end{array}} \right]\times
\displaystyle\left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}
c_1 \\
c_2 \\
c_3 \\
\end{array}} \right][/tex]What do you get for this multiplication?
 
  • #11
I appreciate your help and I apologize for being so stubbornly stupid about this problem, but I don't know what the values for c1 c2 and c3 are.

Also please don't respond in laTex, my computer can't read it. I'm trying to solve that problem but it's hard.
 
  • #12
robertjford80 said:
I appreciate your help and I apologize for being so stubbornly stupid about this problem, but I don't know what the values for c1 c2 and c3 are.
Exactly. You need to find those values. The answer should be in terms of ##x_1##, ##x_2## and ##x_3##.
robertjford80 said:
Also please don't respond in laTex, my computer can't read it. I'm trying to solve that problem but it's hard.
Use a new browser to see LaTeX, which makes the matrix and equations look much clearer and hence more easily understood. Download the latest Firefox. It's free and way better than other browsers. http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/new/
 
  • #13
The only method I know of to find the values is the following and it didn't work

By my reckoning

(1/3)x3 = 0 so x3 = 0. So then I try the second row.

2x3 = (3/2)x2

Divide both sides by two and x2 = 3/4

Plug that into the first row and we have

2x1 - 3 [(3/4)x3] - 2x3 = 0

Simplify

x1 = (11/8)x3
 
  • #14
Read my post #10 again. The matrix form is [itex]UC=X'[/itex]
You are not multiplying with the correct matrix. Leave matrix ##X'## out of any multiplication, as it's alone on the right-hand side.
 
  • #15
I can't really read post 10 because it's in laTex. I have firefox and I can read laTex on this browser but for some reason it doesn't work on this site. I'm trying to find a website where I can just copy the code into some place and the website will translate it.

In any case if it's

UC = X

And if X and C are unknown, then I can't solve for C. I don't see where there are any values for X with which I can't solve for C
 
  • #16
robertjford80 said:
I can't really read post 10 because it's in laTex. I have firefox and I can read laTex on this browser but for some reason it doesn't work on this site. I'm trying to find a website where I can just copy the code into some place and the website will translate it.

What version of Firefox are you using? The latest is 12. On what operating system? To know what version you are using, in the browser top menu, click on Help, then About. Upgrade your browser, if necessary.

If you're still having problem, you could try with Google Chrome or Opera. I just tested with both and the LaTeX code displays properly. Always use the latest version.

Google Chrome: http://www.google.com/chrome

Opera: http://www.opera.com/download/

Ultimately, if your problem persists (in that case, it has to be a problem with your operating system), then your last option would be to use an online LaTeX equation editor: http://www.sciweavers.org/free-online-latex-equation-editor
 
  • #17
I'm out the door, so I will look at this later.
 
  • #18
ok, I can read post 10 now, but I don't understand what I'm supposed to do to

[2 -3 -2]
[0 -1.5 2]
[0 0 .33]

in order to get c1 c2 c3

I can't multiply it by c1 c2 c2 because they're unknown and I've already tried multiplying it to the original matrix and got the wrong answer.
 
  • #19
In the original matrix [itex]AC=X[/itex], you are dealing with three matrices, but two of these matrices, C and X, contain unknowns.

Following post #10, here is what you get:

row1 of matrix U x column of matrix C
row2 of matrix U x column of matrix C
row3 of matrix U x column of matrix C
[tex]2c_1-3c_2-2c_3
\\0c_1-(3/2)c_2+2c_3
\\0c_1+0c_2+(1/3)c_3[/tex]
Now, writing this multiplication result in its proper matrix form, you will get a single column matrix.
[tex]\displaystyle\left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}
2c_1-3c_2-2c_3 \\
-(3/2)c_2+2c_3 \\
(1/3)c_3 \\
\end{array}} \right][/tex]
Then, equate this column matrix with the (right-hand side) column matrix that you previously obtained after reducing the augmented matrix to its triangular form, in other words, ##X'##.
 
Last edited:

1. What is the null space of a 3x3 matrix?

The null space of a 3x3 matrix is the set of all vectors that, when multiplied by the matrix, result in the zero vector. In other words, it is the set of vectors that are mapped to the origin by the matrix.

2. How do you find the null space of a 3x3 matrix?

To find the null space of a 3x3 matrix, you can perform row reduction on the matrix and identify the pivot columns. The remaining columns will form the basis for the null space. Another method is to use the nullity formula, which states that the nullity (dimension of the null space) is equal to the number of non-pivot columns in the row-reduced form of the matrix.

3. Can a 3x3 matrix have a non-trivial null space?

Yes, a 3x3 matrix can have a non-trivial null space. This means that the null space is not just the zero vector, but rather contains at least one non-zero vector. The dimension of the null space can range from 0 (if the matrix is invertible) to 3 (if the matrix is singular).

4. Is the null space of a 3x3 matrix always a subspace?

Yes, the null space of a 3x3 matrix is always a subspace. This is because it satisfies the three properties of a subspace: it contains the zero vector, it is closed under vector addition, and it is closed under scalar multiplication.

5. How does the null space of a 3x3 matrix relate to its rank?

The rank of a 3x3 matrix is equal to the number of pivot columns in its row-reduced form. The dimension of the null space (nullity) is equal to the number of non-pivot columns. Therefore, the rank and nullity add up to the number of columns in the original matrix (3). This relationship is known as the rank-nullity theorem.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
896
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
2K
Back
Top