There is something I don't understand about the recent concept of a "number derivative". It seems to me that the (very illusorious) 'relation' to the real derivative is driving the interest, while a more general pursuit should be in place.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I mean,anyfunction satisfying the Leibniz rule, f(ab) = a f(b) + b f(a) will comply with the following,

[tex]

\begin{array}{ll}

\bullet & f(a^n) = n a^{n-1} f(a) \\

\bullet & f(n) = n \sum_{i=1}^k e_i \frac{f(p_i)}{p_i} \,, \quad

\mbox{where } n = p_1^{e_1} p_2^{e_2} ... p_k^{e_k}

[/tex]

without any need of defining f(p) = 1 for p prime, which is just a particular case.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Number derivative

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads - Number derivative | Date |
---|---|

A Last Gauss Lemma Section II | Feb 4, 2018 |

A Second derivative of a complex matrix | Jan 6, 2018 |

B Why does every subfield of Complex number have a copy of Q? | Jun 11, 2017 |

I Similar Polygons | May 11, 2017 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**