- #1

- 8,682

- 2,745

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter stevendaryl
- Start date

- #1

- 8,682

- 2,745

- #2

Vanadium 50

Staff Emeritus

Science Advisor

Education Advisor

- 26,830

- 10,499

Yes, you can. But what you get doesn't have anything to do with reality.

- #3

- 8,682

- 2,745

Yes, you can. But what you get doesn't have anything to do with reality.

I was just asking about the theory. You have to actually understand the implications of a theory to know whether it has anything to do with reality.

For example: Is QED the same as N=1 QCD? Is electroweak theory the same as N=2 QCD (plus the Higgs)?

- #4

- 17,565

- 8,563

The Abelian gauge group with the gauge group U(1) is the most simple one. An example is QED.

The non-Abelian case is a bit more restrictive. The gauge fields are necessarily self-interacting on the tree level and thus all particles must couple with the same universal coupling strength (coupling constant [itex]g[/itex]) in order to not to destroy the symmetry.

QCD is based on local SU(3) color symmetry. There is nothing special in the number 3 but it's an empirical fact that there are three colors in nature. It can be pretty directly seen on the plot of the [itex]e^+ + e^- \rightarrow \text{hadrons}[/itex] cross section, usually plotted normalized to the QED-tree-level cross section for [itex]e^+ + e^- \rightarrow \mu^+ \mu^-[/itex]. You find it, e.g., here (on page 6):

http://pdg.lbl.gov/2013/reviews/rpp2012-rev-cross-section-plots.pdf

The electroweak sector is based on the gauge group SU(2) x U(1) but somewhat different from QCD in the sense that the gauge group is "Higgsed", i.e., spontaneously broken to U(1).

- #5

- 1,948

- 200

- #6

- 188

- 0

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1/N_expansion

Share: