Numbers gone wrong, free fall

  • Thread starter emyt
  • Start date
  • #1
217
0

Homework Statement



a stone is dropped into th water fro a bridge 44 m above the water. another stone is thrown vertically 1.0s after the first is dropped. Both stones strike the water at the same time. What is the initial speed of the second stone?

Homework Equations



x = x0 + vx0t + 1/2 ax(t)
vx = vxo + axt
x = x0 + 1/2(vx+vx0)(t)

The Attempt at a Solution



it seemed like a pretty simple question, I calculated how long it took for a stone to go from 44 m above the water to 0 m in free fall ( 0 = 44 - 4.9(t) ) then I subtracted 1 second from that time and plugged it into 0 = 44 + vx(8) - 4.9(8) to see the initial velocity of the second stone..

then something strange happened.. I tried to plot a speed v.s. time graph and so I wanted to find the velocity of the stone at a point in time.. so I plugged vx = -4.9(9) and I get some pretty big number.. -88.. then I tried plugging it into x = 1/2(-88)(9) and I get a humongous number.. what's going on?

thanks
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
354
2
Hi, firstly your equation is wrong x = x0 + vx0t + 1/2 ax(t). You see a.t will give you the unit of m/s however v.t gives you m which is distance so how can you add speed with distance? Secondly x0 is the initial displacement from a point a reference and x is your final displacement. Try again and i believe your approach is correct :biggrin:
 
  • #3
217
0
Hi, firstly your equation is wrong x = x0 + vx0t + 1/2 ax(t). You see a.t will give you the unit of m/s however v.t gives you m which is distance so how can you add speed with distance? Secondly x0 is the initial displacement from a point a reference and x is your final displacement. Try again and i believe your approach is correct :biggrin:
I'm not sure :S, that equation should work shouldn't it? I've used it before.. Also, my x0 is 44 because I'm taking that as the initial distance and so my acceleration is negative because it will go from 44m to 0m


thanks
 
  • #4
354
2
I'm not sure :S, that equation should work shouldn't it? I've used it before.. Also, my x0 is 44 because I'm taking that as the initial distance and so my acceleration is negative because it will go from 44m to 0m
Yeap you are correct in the displacement part :tongue: however as i mentioned if you were to look at the equation you wrote, the units on the left and right won't add up do they? I believe the equation is x = x0 + vt + 0.5at^2
 
  • #5
217
0
Yeap you are correct in the displacement part :tongue: however as i mentioned if you were to look at the equation you wrote, the units on the left and right won't add up do they? I believe the equation is x = x0 + vt + 0.5at^2
the equation is x = x0 + vx0t (initial velocity) + 0.5at^2 and it should work, as it comes from x = x0 + 1/2(v + vx0 )t which is just the addition of distances..

thanks
 
  • #6
217
0
can someone help please..
 
  • #7
354
2
What seem to be your problem? 0 = 44 - 4.9(t) should be 0 = 44 - 4.9(t2)
 
  • #8
217
0
What seem to be your problem? 0 = 44 - 4.9(t) should be 0 = 44 - 4.9(t2)

AH right.. I forgot that it was at^2

thanks a lot!!
 

Related Threads on Numbers gone wrong, free fall

Replies
64
Views
9K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
9K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
988
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
2K
Top