1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Numerical Methods Help

  1. Mar 20, 2005 #1
    Numerical Methods Help!!

    I have been trying to understand the differences between Finite-Difference Time-Domain (FDTD), Finite Volume, and the Finite Elements methods of solving Maxwell's equations numerically. I have used the FDTD method for solving Maxwells Equations. I did this without knowing anything about the other two methods. So, now I need to know how FDTD is different from the other two.

    Thanks
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Mar 20, 2005 #2
    In the finite elements approach you compute a solution of the differential equation on each element and then you "assemble" these individual solutions into a global one. So you solve your differential equation on each element.

    In the finite difference approach you work always with global solutions. The differential operators are represented by matrices and the differential equation is reduced to a linear system of equations. Solving this system you obtain directly the solution of the differential equation.

    Another difference consists of the fact that the finite element method is limited to a well defined class of differential equations (see Lax-Milgram theorem).

    Hope it helps
    clive
     
    Last edited: Mar 20, 2005
  4. Mar 20, 2005 #3
    That's a great help clive. You don't happen to know anything about the finite volume approach?

    Thanks again

    Kurt
     
  5. Mar 21, 2005 #4
  6. Mar 21, 2005 #5
    Finite volume methods are used when you have a conservation law to work with. Something like [tex] u_t + f_x = 0 [/tex] where f(u) is a flux. Rather than just evaluating u at grid points as you do in finite differences, you need to average u over little cells to get the value for a point. You have to make sure what goes out of cell i is going into cell i+1. Finite volume methods can be useful if you're trying to handle a shock without screwing everything up.
     
  7. Mar 22, 2005 #6

    SpaceTiger

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    What should you use if you do want to screw everything up?
     
  8. Mar 22, 2005 #7

    HallsofIvy

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    Ah, now I'm an expert on that!
     
  9. Mar 22, 2005 #8
    Finite differences would be a good start. If you apply a finite difference method and a finite volume method to the same problem which contains a shock, the finite differences method will probably give you garbage and the finite volume method will probably give you yummy stuff.

    A non-conservative method is likely to give you a solution which propagates the shock at the wrong speed. This results in incorrect/inconsistent fluxes across the domain. If you're using a finite volume scheme derived from a conservation equation this will never happen, because an incorrect flux would mean your thing is not being conserved, and these methods don't allow that. Of course you could still get the wrong answer for other reasons.

    In fact, a finite volume scheme can give many solutions for a problem with a shock, and mathematically they may all work. But only one solution will make physical sense, so you need to use an entropy satisfying scheme to automatically pick the right solution.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Numerical Methods Help
  1. Numerical Methods (Replies: 1)

  2. Numerical methods (Replies: 12)

Loading...