Suppose I want to solve the Schrödinger equation numerically for some potential V(x). The easiest way to do so, is to discretize it on a grid of finite length, and apply a finite difference scheme to approximate the second order derivative. Doing so yields an eigenvalue equation on matrix form for the wavefunctions and their corresponding energies, which may then be found by diagonalization.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

The above method was the way I always solved the Schrödinger equation, when numerical work was needed. However, now I am faced with a problem, where I need to impose a boundary condition on the boundary of my interval. In the method above you implicitly assume that the wavefunctions outside the domain you are looking at, but for my current problem this will no longer work. Is there a way to adapt the finite difference method above to handle the case with a non-zero boundary condition? Worse even, my boundary condition differs for the different eigenmodes. I.e. the groundstate has one value at the boundary, the first excited another and so on. Could this also be incorporated easily?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# I Numerical solution of Schrödinger equation

Have something to add?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads - Numerical solution Schrödinger | Date |
---|---|

Numerical solution of SE for cylindrical well | Sep 20, 2015 |

Numerical solution of Schrodinger equation | Sep 5, 2015 |

Schrodinger equation numerical solution | Aug 23, 2015 |

Numerically solutions with periodic boundary conditions | Sep 22, 2014 |

Numerical solution of one dimensional Schrodinger equation | Apr 18, 2014 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**