Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Nutcracker fusion

  1. Nov 24, 2015 #1
    Would it be possible to mechanically trap deuterium and tritum atoms and squeeze them together in a nutcracker type device to fuse them? I believe we have technology to manipulate individual atoms, or at least small quantities, and it should be possible to get them into a vise. This would avoid the high energies and temperatures of other approaches.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Nov 24, 2015 #2
    Well what you are looking for here is device capable of generating such a high pressure and density that the atoms spontaneously fuse.
    Such systems are not only possible, they actually exist, but they are hardly 'low energy'.
    They are called stars.
     
  4. Nov 24, 2015 #3
    No, I'm looking for a device to mechanically overcome the Coulomb force for just a few atoms at a time, avoiding high temp and pressure. I believe the energy needed is on the order of .1MeV
     
  5. Nov 24, 2015 #4

    mathman

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    The problem is confining the force needed to a small area. Laser fusion program is vaguely similar to what you want.
     
  6. Nov 24, 2015 #5
    What I'm asking is whether some kind of mechanical confinement can achieve the goal. We've made great advances in nanotechnology, why not nano-nutcrackers to squeeze atoms together? As for laser fusion, wouldn't that also be easier to achieve with micro or nano-sized fuel pellets?
     
  7. Nov 24, 2015 #6
    There are diamond anvils that create great pressures. But not nearly enough for fusion. It seems to me that almost any material would shatter before it would cause hydrogen to fuse.

    Right now they are trying to produce liquid metallic hydrogen with diamond anvils, but the diamonds shatter. It seems to me that the hydrogen is going to diffuse into any conceivable material before it will fuse with itself.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Nov 24, 2015
  8. Nov 24, 2015 #7
    Would the first problem go away if you're dealing with very small amounts? If I'm right about needing only on the order of .1MeV, that doesn't seem diamond-shattering. On the other hand the diffusion issue seems more serious. Or would a speedy operation get around that?
     
  9. Nov 25, 2015 #8

    mathman

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Pellets are small. ~.1 mm diameter in at least one program.
     
  10. Nov 25, 2015 #9
    Which program, and do you know if that's giving them better results?
     
  11. Nov 26, 2015 #10

    mathman

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    The only specific size I found was for an older program (Shiva). Google "laser fusion pellet" gives lots of hits, but it is hard to find numbers for the size.
     
  12. Dec 1, 2015 #11

    mheslep

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Yes that's the ballpark, fusion occurs as low as ~0.01 MeV for the ions of deuterium and tritium fuel. One way to look at the problem with using a mechanical "nutcracker" is that the chemical bonds holding together solid lattices are on order of a couple eV, tens of thousands times less: a bit like trying slam two cannon balls together with cotton candy. That's of course as one would expect, else fusion would be ongoing all the time inside the earth where pressures are extreme, but far short of that which can be found inside of a star.
     
  13. Dec 3, 2015 #12

    e.bar.goum

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor

    I'm going to have to remember that analogy, it's just a bit brilliant.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Nutcracker fusion
  1. Nuclear fusion (Replies: 5)

  2. Questions on Fusion (Replies: 28)

  3. Fusion or Fission? (Replies: 16)

  4. Fusion power (Replies: 2)

Loading...