Oblate spheroid equations

  • Thread starter ianyappy
  • Start date
I'm a little confused by what appears to me to be a paradox. I understand that the equation for an oblate spheroid is given by
\frac{x ^ 2+y^2}{a^2} + \frac{z ^ 2}{c^2}= 1, c < a
where a and c are the semi-major and semi-minor axes respectively.
However, the definitions for the WGS 84 oblate spheroid model of the Earth using the ECEF <--> geodetic latitude/longitude/height are (Wiki Link) the following equations
x = N(\phi) cos\phi cos\lambda \\
y = N(\phi) cos\phi sin\lambda \\
z = N(\phi)(1-e^2) sin \phi \\
N(\phi) = \frac{a}{\sqrt{1-e^2 sin^2\phi}}
where [itex]\phi[/itex] is the geodetic latitude, [itex]\lambda[/itex] is the longitude, e is the eccentricity and a is the semi-major axis. I removed the height parameter as I am only concerned with the spheroid surface.

I have also read a paper which states the equation relating the ECEF X,Y,Z is
\frac{x ^ 2+y^2}{N(\phi)^2} + \frac{z ^ 2}{[N(\phi)(1-e^2)]^2}= 1

The last equation has denominators that depends on the geodetic latitude while the first equation for the oblate spheroid has denominators which are constant. Is there something wrong?
Last edited:


Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
2018 Award
The equation you quote for an oblate spheroid uses geocentric latitude. I believe the equations on the Wiki page use geodetic latitude. There is a comment about that on the page you linked.
Well yes, but isn't ECEF independent of geodetic/geocentric coordinates? Then in the last equation, this seems to suggest that x,y,z must fit a different equation for different geodetic latitudes.

Physics Forums Values

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving

Hot Threads