ODEs: Not sure why

  • Thread starter Benny
  • Start date
  • #1
584
0
I was reading something about ODEs and I came across a section which discusses the generalisation of first-order isobaric equations to equations of general order n. The definition I have is that an n-th order isobaric equation is one in which every term can be made dimensionally consistent upon giving y and dy each a weight m, and x and dx each a weight of 1.

The "weights" referred to are the same as those for first order isobaric equations so I follow that part. What I don't understand is the process used to determine the weights of each term in an isobaric ODE. For example:

[tex]
x^3 \frac{{d^2 y}}{{dx^2 }} - \left( {x^2 + xy} \right)\frac{{dy}}{{dx}} + \left( {y^2 + xy} \right) = 0
[/tex]..eq1.

The book says that from left to right, the "weights" of each term on the LHS are m+1, m+1, 2m, 2m, m + 1.

From an earlier section, an example of a first order isobaric equation is:

[tex]
\frac{{dy}}{{dx}} = - \frac{1}{{2yx}}\left( {y^2 + \frac{2}{x}} \right)
[/tex]...eq2

Weights are assigned to y, dy, x and dx as before. However, unlike with eq1, to determine the weights of y, dy, x and dx, eq2 is rewritten as [tex]\left( {y^2 + \frac{2}{x}} \right)dx + 2yxdy = 0[/tex] and then the weights are determined.

I would've thought that the method used(as in move everything to LHS) to determine the weights of the terms in eq1, would be applicable to eq2. After all, isn't eq2 just a 'special case' of equations like eq1? I'm just wondering why eq1 can be left as it is in determining the weights of y, dy, dx and x whereas eq2 needs to be rearranged prior to the assignment of weights. Any help would be good, thanks.

Edit: Fixed first paragraph. The terms x and dx are assigned weights of 1 not m.
 
Last edited:

Answers and Replies

Related Threads on ODEs: Not sure why

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
701
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
667
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
9
Views
978
Top