- #1
Rymer
- 181
- 0
Only comment on this is that most of this is correct WITHIN the current model used for the cosmological redshift. The model itself is NOT fully proved and the details -- such as the actual values of distances quoted -- are subject to change and revision of the model -- as is true for all scientific models.
Some statements -- like changes in the expansion rate and implied relative velocities greater than the speed of light are part of the unproved portion of the current model.
For all the talk about 'precision cosmology' we are still very far away from being able to claim that. (This claim seems to be more related to promoting money from various sources than to any real scientific accuracy.)
Some statements -- like changes in the expansion rate and implied relative velocities greater than the speed of light are part of the unproved portion of the current model.
For all the talk about 'precision cosmology' we are still very far away from being able to claim that. (This claim seems to be more related to promoting money from various sources than to any real scientific accuracy.)