Older faster if the universe wouldn't be expanding?

  • Thread starter niko2000
  • Start date
  • #1
51
0
Would we be getting older faster if the universe wouldn't be expanding?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
HallsofIvy
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
41,833
956
Compared to what? If time were "running" faster throughout the universe, we wouldn't notice because there would be nothing to compare it with.

Notice that if one person were traveling much faster than the other he would see the second "aging slower" but would not think of himself as aging any faster than normal (and, in fact, the second person would see the first person as aging slower!).
 
  • #3
51
0
The question was incomplete.
We wouldn't feel any difference in any case, but time would run faster. That's the thing I don't know...what could we compare with our time?
 
  • #4
343
0
niko2000 said:
Would we be getting older faster if the universe wouldn't be expanding?
Yes, possibly, depending on what you consider the alternative to expanding. If you are considering contraction, as in back toward the Big Crunch, then time would move faster, and so would aging.
 
  • #5
niko2000 said:
Would we be getting older faster if the universe wouldn't be expanding?

Well, what would be your reference to 'aging slower' or 'faster'? If time was running any slower or faster due to the rate of expansion in the universe, no one would notice, since there would be no reference to compare what would be faster or slower. Least that's how I see it.
 
Last edited:

Related Threads on Older faster if the universe wouldn't be expanding?

Replies
18
Views
971
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
36
Views
14K
Replies
3
Views
590
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
5K
Top