Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Omega Man

  1. Dec 4, 2003 #1
    I first read this story in New Scientist when I was collecting it. Here are some highlights:

    The article has been reposted here: http://www.you.com.au/news/362.htm and in many other places.

    Any comments?
  2. jcsd
  3. Dec 5, 2003 #2


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    I wonder what Chaitin himself thinks of this article.

    Unfortunately, newspaper and magazine writers, writing about science or mathematics that they don't understand have a tendency to over-dramatise. Sounds to me like an extension of Goedel's work. And the "omega" of the title is a particular example of a non-computable number. We've known they exist for some time.
  4. Dec 5, 2003 #3


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Gold Member
    Dearly Missed

    Chaitin has written stuff himself that is scarcely less lurid than this. He is, um, _very enthusiastic_ about his theory and his place in history.
  5. Dec 5, 2003 #4
    anybody understood the part with Diophantine equations from the article?
  6. Dec 5, 2003 #5
    A number with no structure... Randomness... sounds saucy, and it reminds me of QM.
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook