On divergence

  1. Hi folks -- could anyone think of a justification of the idea that if a function's arguments diverge (i.e. are taken to infinity), there's a high probability that the function too will diverge?

    This would be really helpful for thinking about fundamental theories in particle physics, so any help much appreciated!
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Not about "high probability", but if your function is nice enough, complex analysis could be of use. Liouville's theorem at least tells you that non-constant differentiable functions [itex]\mathbb C \to \mathbb C[/itex] are unbounded. I'd guess there's some related machinery that would help more.
     
  4. HallsofIvy

    HallsofIvy 40,504
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    That statement will make sense if you have some way of "measuring" sets of functions so that you can talk about "probability" in relation to sets of functions.
     
  5. mfb

    Staff: Mentor

    Unbounded, but they don't have to go to infinity. sin(z) for z on the real axis is an example of a function that stays bounded for an argument that goes to infinity.


    I agree with HallsofIvy, without some way to define a probability this does not work.
    Why?
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share a link to this question via email, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?

0
Draft saved Draft deleted