Hi, I have a question,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

As it is said in QM, if two operators commute, they have so many common eigenstates that they form a basis. And the inverse is right.

Now there is the question,

if A,B,C are operators, [A,B]=0, [A,C]=0,

then is "[B,C]=0" also right?

If we simply say A and B, A and C both have common eigenstates, so B and C have common eigenstates, so [B,C]=0, it seems to be right.

But in QFT, if x,y spacelike, then [\phi(x),\phi(y)]=0,

if the above is right, then we can find a point z which is spacelike according to two non-spacelike point x,y to make any non-spacelike [\phi(x),\phi(y)]=0. It looks like a paradox.

thank you!

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# On operator commutation

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**