Can somebody explain me about the trivial zeros?(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Why [tex] \zeta(-2) = \zeta(-4) = \zeta(-6) = 0 = \zeta(k)[/tex]

So [tex] \zeta(k) \sum_{n=1}^{ \infty} \frac{1}{n^k} = 0 [/tex]?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# On Riemann Hypothesis

Loading...

Similar Threads - Riemann Hypothesis | Date |
---|---|

Riemann Hypothesis equivalence | Oct 13, 2011 |

Riemann hypothesis and number theory | Mar 2, 2011 |

The clue to the proof of Riemann hypothesis | Jan 25, 2011 |

Elliott-Halberstam conjecture and the Riemann Hypothesis | Jan 8, 2011 |

Riemann Hypothesis and Quantum Mechanics | Dec 21, 2010 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**