I'm trying to understand this problem and could do with some help.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

A small business is trying to measure their delivery performance in terms of "on-time, in-full & error-free".

It sent out product to 4 customers (A,B,C,D) and notes down what the performance was: 0 = not ok, 1 = ok.

(Apologies for not being able to do a table)

__________A_B_C_D

on time____1_0_1_1

in full______1_1_1_0

error free___0_1_1_1

Overall_____0_0_1_0

It is clear that only 1 out of 4 (25%) actually received goods on-time, in-full & error-free.

But then, a customer calls Sales and asks "What are the chances of my order being on-time in full and error-free?

The Sales guy thinks to himself:

Well, 3 out 4 (75%) were on time, 75% were in full & 75% were error-free so the chances are:

0.75 x 0.75 x 0.75 = 0.42

and tells the customer "There is a 42% chance your order will be on-time, in-full & error-free"

Can anybody explain why there is such a difference between the actual performance and the probability?

Thanks in advance.

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# On-time, In-full & error-free

Loading...

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**