Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

One parameter family of metrics

  1. Dec 1, 2007 #1

    Haelfix

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Sorry about the horrible confusion in this post, I am befuddled and likely spouting gibberish.

    Consider the general case of a one parameter family of metrics, where the parameter in question need not be finite (it can limit to infinity for instance). I am looking for a topology that is big enough to accomodate the entire family. (im not even sure how this should work, since im used to thinking off one topology for one metric)

    It seems to me in general, whatever this huge topology is, it need not and probably cannot be metricizable. Is this true, and can you think of any other constraints?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Dec 5, 2007 #2

    Chris Hillman

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Hmm... lots of large topological spaces are metrizable, so don't give up hope. But without more context (maybe some examples of the kind of one parameter family of metrics you are looking at it?) I at least cannot suggest a candidate for a suitable topology.

    It's nice to see an intriguing question, though :smile:
     
  4. Dec 5, 2007 #3

    George Jones

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    I don't know enough to be any of help (hopefully Chris can), but I do know that Hawking used a similar idea in his formulation of the concept of stable causality. A spacetime (M,g) is stably causal if there isn't another Lorentz metric g' "close" to g such that (M,g') admits closed timlike curves.

    Hawking defined "close" using a suitable topology on a collection of Lorentzian metrics on M. See pages 197/198 of Hawking and Ellis.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: One parameter family of metrics
  1. One- parameter groups (Replies: 3)

Loading...