So, I have to prove that in the metric space (R^n, d), where d is the standard Euclidean metric, B(x1, r1) = B(x2, r2) <==> x1 = x2 & r1 = r2.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I finished the proof, but I'm not sure about one step.

Assume B(x1, r1) = B(x2, r2) with x1 = x2. Using the triangle inequality for x1, x and x2, one obtains d(x1, x2) <= d(x1, x) + d(x, x2) < r1 + r2. Now, since this holds for any x1, x and x2, and specially, for any corresponding r1 and r2, i.e. r1 + r2, we conclude that d(x1, x2) = 0, so x1 = x2. Is this correct?

If so, then it is easy to prove the rest - assume B(x1, r1) = B(x2, r2) with x1 = x2 and r1 =/ r2, one easily derives a contradiction.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Open ball proof

Loading...

Similar Threads - Open ball proof | Date |
---|---|

I Open interval (set) end points and differentiability. | Jul 30, 2016 |

B Can open sets be described in-terms of closed sets? | Apr 9, 2016 |

Standard notation for "open integral" | May 13, 2015 |

Prove combination of two sets contains an open ball | Dec 17, 2011 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**