Opera boss swings at Firefox's Sugar Daddies

  • Thread starter klusener
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Sugar
In summary: Opera also has a lot of features that Firefox does not have, such as tabbed browsing. Firefox is great for those who want to customize their browser to their liking, but for the average person, Opera is definitely the better choice.
  • #1
klusener
62
0
You make the world's best browser. It's smaller and faster than Internet Explorer, and a lot more secure, and every year you think up new ideas that make browsing easier. Then a rival appears that steals your ideas and yet only manages to produce a slower, clunkier and feature limited version of your browser - and the press reacts as if it's just discovered the internet for the first time. What do you do?

So far, Opera CEO Jon von Tetzchner has been pretty circumspect about FireFox - and he's always said respectful things[*] about Mozilla browsers to us. But he did take a swideswipe at the open source project in an interview with CNET this week.

"A lot of people don't like our ads, which is sad as we don't have a rich sugar daddy like the Mozilla Foundation. They [the Mozilla Firefox team] don't have to think about money as they're being funded. We're not being funded," he said.

A fair comment, or not?

Well, the Mozilla Foundation was founded with a $2 million donation from AOL, when the latter washed its hands of the albatross in 2003. AOL had inherited the world's most popular web browser, but thanks to the spectacular self-indulgence of the Mozilla programmers, had nothing to show for it five years later. Firefox has gone some way to redressing this reputation for buggy bloatware, but the fact remains that Microsoft's dominance is not due to nefarious channel tactics, which it had been obliged to give up when the Antitrust trial started, but to Mozilla's failure to give the public a halfway decent browser for several years. Mozilla had it, but threw it away.

But looking at the staffing levels of the Mozilla Foundation, and its marketing spend, tells a different story. With only around 20 employees, it certainly isn't SMERSH.

So we're not sure how wise this aside from von Tetzchner is. Opera's insane focus on usability and performance certainly comes from knowing that a paying user base pays its rent. Stop satisfying the users, and Opera is no more. And side by side comparisons of Opera and Firefox invariably show the former standing proud: its blazing rendering speed and caching leave Firefox standing. Firefox's greatest strength is its extensibility, but that's also it greatest weakness: if you need to add anything more than the most rudimentary functionality to the browser it soon turns into a Heath Robinson hairball of conflicting add-ins. (And after all that, you still can't move the tabs around...) Opera is a public company that's expanding at a healthy clip, and it shouldn't need to worry.

For several years Opera was the subject of a muttering campaign in Silicon Valley from jealous developers who couldn't quite believe that something so wonderful could also be self-supporting. Opera, they said, must be receiving sponsorship: probably from the EU or the Norwegian government. These rumors were entirely unfounded: Opera has always had to make its way from honest revenue. People can, and do, pay for quality...

http://www.channelregister.co.uk/2005/06/23/whos_your_sugar_daddy/

Opera

What do you guys think about this article?
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
  • #2
RMS says this!
Gosling says that!
Gates says this!
Opera says that!

One thing to understand is,
"People use what they want to"
Joe : I like opera, i use opera.
Mary : Hey what's that icon with fox curled up?? hey that's internet explorer!
Bob : Internet?

All rants aside, Opera does blow firefox away as long as usability and features are concerned. Whats the big plus of firefox? Its open source, as long as it has support base, we can be sure, no one will even think of monopolising the market. So what us smart customers need to do? Use both firefox and opera, so that you know , that you have atleast one to fallback on if the other turns evil!

-- AI
 
  • #3
Well, Opera has an annoying advertisement bar, which Firefox has not... so it I guess it is quite obvious why Firefox is preferred over Opera.
 

1. What is the story about "Opera boss swings at Firefox's Sugar Daddies"?

The story is about the CEO of Opera, a web browser company, publicly criticizing Mozilla's partnership with Google and Yahoo as their main sources of revenue. He believes this reliance on search engine giants is hurting the open internet and smaller companies like Opera.

2. Why is the Opera CEO concerned about Mozilla's partnerships with Google and Yahoo?

The Opera CEO believes that these partnerships create a monopoly in the search engine market and limit the choices for users. He also argues that it gives these companies too much control over the internet and can lead to biased search results.

3. How does the Opera CEO suggest Mozilla should fund their operations instead of relying on search engine partnerships?

The Opera CEO suggests that Mozilla should diversify their revenue streams by exploring alternative sources such as subscription models, donations, or partnerships with smaller companies.

4. Is this the first time the Opera CEO has spoken out against Google and Yahoo's partnerships with other web browsers?

No, the Opera CEO has been vocal about this issue for several years, as he believes it is important to promote a more open and fair internet for all companies, not just the big players.

5. How has Mozilla responded to the Opera CEO's criticism?

Mozilla has not publicly responded to the Opera CEO's comments. However, they have previously stated that their partnerships with search engines are essential for their sustainability and allow them to offer their products and services for free.

Similar threads

  • General Discussion
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
46
Views
5K
Back
Top