1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Optics D:

  1. Jan 21, 2009 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    Blue light of wavelength 470nm is diffracted by a grating ruled 5000 lines/cm.

    a) compute the angular deviation of the second-order image
    b) what is the highest order-image theoretically possible with this wavelength and grating


    2. Relevant equations
    stumped

    Ephoton = hc/lambda
    Ee= hf
    Lambda = h/mv

    3. The attempt at a solution

    i figured i could have used a waves, sound & light formula like

    lambda = dsin@/n

    but there arent any nodes,

    stumped, sorry
    help is very much appreciated considering this question is really pissing me off
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data



    2. Relevant equations



    3. The attempt at a solution
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Jan 21, 2009 #2
    i beg for help for i really cannot interpret the question, i am a poohead
     
  4. Jan 21, 2009 #3
    Let me see if i can steer you the right way.

    Light coming from a diffraction grating can be described by:

    a * sin(θm) = mλ

    Where a = space between gratings

    θm is the angle from the normal (coming strait out of the grating)

    m is the mth diffraction order

    λ is the wavelength of light.

    Read these pages for a nice diagram that will help make more sense.

    I'll check back later and see if you ended up in the right place:)

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diffraction_grating
    also read up on diffraction
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diffraction

    http://www.csupomona.edu/~hcmireles/PreLabWebpages/Hydrogen Emission Spectrum/Hydrogen.htm
     
    Last edited: Jan 21, 2009
  5. Jan 22, 2009 #4
    sorry im still not interpreting your answer, what would i do with 5000 lines/cm in inserting it into helping me solve for an answer
     
  6. Jan 22, 2009 #5
    like how would i get a
     
  7. Jan 22, 2009 #6
    So basically you want to know how many cm / line right? That is how far is it inbetween each line? Well you have cm / line right now and you want line / cm.

    So all you have to do is invert :) it's the same thing as going from a wavelength to a frequency, you have a certain frequency of lines per distance. You want the actual distance between lines.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frequency

    F = 1 / t

    Note* doesn't apply to an electromagnetic wave such as light.
    If you were given the frequency of the blue light in the problem it would be determined by Frequency of Light = c / Wavelength. Where c is the speed of light in the medium. But don't worry about that at this time. That was just a side note.

    Back to the problem. Inverting gives you the distance between your lines, a.

    1 / (5000 line/cm) = .0002 cm/line
     
  8. Jan 22, 2009 #7
    so i did what you said and the angle i get is 27, so where could i have gone wrong, what answer do you get?
     
  9. Jan 22, 2009 #8
    So put in different values for m to solve for the different diffraction orders.

    m = 1 will give one answer

    m = 2 will give another (27)

    m = 3 and so on

    The question you're supposed to answer is

    A.) I've never used angular deviation before so i'm trying to figure out the definition. Then i'll see if i can help with that part:) Or maybe someone else can.

    b.) So at what point will the diffraction orders disappear? Another way to think about it is how much angular swing do you have before there is physically something in the way of the next diffraction order?
     
    Last edited: Jan 22, 2009
  10. Jan 22, 2009 #9
    well i think A) your trying to find θ for the 2nd order image right which would be m, and you know the wavelength 470nm and you know m=0.0002 cm. would this get me 28 degrees tho?
     
  11. Jan 22, 2009 #10
    okay so i understand A) you computed 1/5000 line/cm wrong, you should've used 1.0 x10^-2/ 5000 line/cm then plug 2.0x10^-6 in for the equation thank you for your help though
     
  12. Jan 22, 2009 #11
    but still i don't understand the concepts of B)
     
  13. Jan 23, 2009 #12
    Last edited: Jan 23, 2009
  14. Jan 24, 2009 #13
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Optics D:
  1. Optics: Interference (Replies: 0)

  2. Modern Optics (Replies: 1)

Loading...