1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Optics: Interference and Phase

  1. Apr 6, 2013 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

    Two flat slides of glass are seperated at one edge by a thin wire, as shown below. The top surface of the upper slide and the bottom surface of the lower slide have special coatings on them so that they reflect no light. The system is illuminated with light of wavelength 534. nm. Looking down from above you see 28 interference minima.

    a) What is the diameter of the wire? Assume that the last minima occurs at the right edge where the wire is placed.

    2. Relevant equations

    See below (also see attached image)

    3. The attempt at a solution

    Seems simple enough at first glance... combining the knowledge that there is a phase inversion with the fact that we're dealing with minima, I used the formula 2*(thickness) = (number of minima) * (wavelength). But I'm not sure how to incorporate the additional information that the coating is non reflective... I know this means the reflected waves emerge 1/2 cycle out of phase. Now I'm just confused...
     

    Attached Files:

  2. jcsd
  3. Apr 6, 2013 #2
    I think what they are saying is that you do not consider the non-reflecting surfaces in the problem. The only surfaces to consider in this problem are the bottom surface of the top slide and the top surface of the bottom slide.
     
  4. Apr 6, 2013 #3
    Thanks! But when I plugged in the values into the equation 2*(thickness) = (number of minima) * (wavelength), I didn't get the right answer... there must be something I'm still missing, but I don't know what it is.
     
  5. Apr 6, 2013 #4
    Hmmm.. Are you remembering that there is a 180 deg phase shift at one of the surfaces, at the second one. Remember if the index of refraction goes from low to a higher value, there is a 180 phase shift as I recall. Hig to a lower is no shift. Maybe this is the difference.
     
  6. Apr 6, 2013 #5
    See if you are off by 1/2 wavelength.
     
  7. Apr 6, 2013 #6
    OK. So just to confirm, if I wrote that 2*(thickness) = [(number of minima) * (wavelength)] + [(1/2)*(wavelength)], would that be right?
     
  8. Apr 6, 2013 #7
    I have not worked the problem but I would think this might be the error. It might be plus or minus 1/2 wavelength.
     
  9. Apr 7, 2013 #8
    Hmm... I tried that and it didn't work either. Is there something fundamental I'm not grasping? That's what I'm most worried about now.
     
  10. Apr 7, 2013 #9
    deleted
     
    Last edited: Apr 7, 2013
  11. Apr 7, 2013 #10
    Correction correction correction because of the 180d phase shift, the first dark band will be at
    The first minima will be where 2t = 0 w w= wavelength
    2nd minima will be when 2t = 1w
    3rd minima will be when 2t = 2w
    4th minima will be when 2t =3w

    so the 28th minima will be when 2t = 27w

    w = 534E-9 so I would expect the 28th minima to be where t = 7209 nm

    yes-no?
     
    Last edited: Apr 7, 2013
  12. Apr 7, 2013 #11
    Thanks a ton - that was right!
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Optics: Interference and Phase
Loading...