Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

< or = to 1

  1. Feb 18, 2009 #1
    I have read a question which has

    Two events A and B such that p(A) = r and p(B) = s with r,s >0 and
    r + s > 1

    My querry is about r + s > 1 is this possible ? I thought that it had to be < or = to 1


    regards
    Brendan
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Feb 18, 2009 #2

    CompuChip

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Re: Probability

    Suppose you have a die, and you throw it once. Let A be "the outcome is 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5" and B "the outcome is 3, 4, 5 or 6".

    Note however, that though p(A) + p(B) > 1, you always have p(A + B) <= 1 (with p(A + B) being the probability of A or B happening).
     
  4. Feb 18, 2009 #3

    HallsofIvy

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    Re: Probability

    If A and B are "mutually exclusive" events, then P(A+ B)= P(A)+ P(B). Since P(A+B) cannot be larger than 1, neither can P(A)+ P(B).

    But if A and B are NOT "mutually exclusive" that is not true. Suppose you roll a single die. Let A be "the number on the die is larger than 2" and B is "the number on the die is even"
    Since there are 4 numbers on the die larger than 2, P(A)= 4/5= 2/3. Since there are 3 even numbers on the die, P(B)= 3/6= 1/2. P(A)+ P(B)= 2/3+ 1/2= 7/6> 1.

    Of course, that is NOT P(A+B). The numbers on the die that are "either larger than 2 or even" are 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 so P(A+ B)= 5/6.

    "Larger than 3 or even" are not mutually exclusive. 4 and 6 are both "larger than 3" and even. P(A and B)= 2/6= 1/3 so P(A+ B)= P(A)+ P(B)- P(A and B)= 2/3+ 1/2- 1/3= 7/6- 2/6= 5/6.
     
  5. Feb 18, 2009 #4
    Re: Probability

    Thanks very much guys.
    I see that it makes sense that they could both equal > 1 if both are not mutually exclusive.

    Now I just have to prove it !
     
  6. Feb 18, 2009 #5
    Re: Probability

    Don't you mean:

    p(A + B) <= P(a)+P(b)

    which is a triangle inequality.
     
  7. Feb 19, 2009 #6

    CompuChip

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Re: Probability

    Yes, that is also true. Actually I think it is something like
    [tex]p(A \cup B) = p(A) + p(B) - p(A \cap B)[/tex]
    which shows both the triangle inequality and the statement about mutually exclusive events (where [itex]A \cap B[/itex] is empty).

    However, the point I wanted to stress is that the probability of A or B is always less than or equal to one, as you'd expect, contrary to the probability of A plus the probability of B; therefore p(A) + p(B) is not the same as p(A + B).
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: < or = to 1
  1. 1 = -1 (Replies: 6)

  2. -1 = 1? (Replies: 3)

  3. 1 = -1 ! (Replies: 16)

  4. -1 = 1 ? (Replies: 9)

  5. 1 = -1 ? (Replies: 7)

Loading...