A recent post asked "why does physical space need to be 3-dimensional?"(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

However, the thread became infected with personal insults and was (properly) closed.

I felt sorry that PeterDonis, whose posts I respect, was subjected to this abuse !

I have read several posts which start by assuming that our universe has a certain topology, such as a shell universe.

Could anyone refer me to paper(s) that postulate a universe which starts with particles thinly spread out in multiple spatial dimensions, 10, 11, or perhaps even Hilbert space, none of the dimensions being degenerate. Then, taking advantage of the instability of orbits for spatial dimensions greater than 3, describes the collapse of matter within this hyper-space into either singularities, or into 3-D sub-manifolds with perhaps varying topologies, for each of which orbits become stable.

Note that such a paper need not assume that our universe actually started this way, but would be entirely a mathematical exercise.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# I Origin of 3 spatial dimensions

Tags:

Have something to add?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads for Origin spatial dimensions |
---|

B Did the Big Bang create space and time? |

B Are the 3 space dimensions "equal"? |

A Can a 3d holographic universe exist in 3d? |

I Origin of supermassive blackholes in the very early universe |

B Our solar system and its fellows |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**