1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Orthogonal compliment proof

  1. Jul 28, 2009 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    Let A be an mxn matrix.
    a. Prove that the set W of row vectors x in R^m such that xA=0 is a subspace of R^m.

    b. Prove that the subspace W in part a. and the column space of A are orthogonal compliments.


    2. Relevant equations



    3. The attempt at a solution
    a. to be a subspace, I believe i only need to show that W is closed under addition and multiplication. So I just show that (rx+sy)A=0. Right?

    b. Not too sure about this. Should I try to show that x dotted with a=0 for all x and a? Or should try to do something with the properties of orthogonal compliments? I can show that dim(W)= nullity(A), but I don't think that's really going to do anything for me.
     
    Last edited: Jul 28, 2009
  2. jcsd
  3. Jul 28, 2009 #2

    Office_Shredder

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    For part a you have the right idea.

    For part b, If you look at the row vector x dotted with one of the columns of W, say a, then where in the vector xA can you find that number?
     
  4. Jul 28, 2009 #3
    For a row vector x dotted with the column vector ai, the resuting value will be the ith column of the 1xn zero vector. This for me does not guarantee that the value will be zero, however.
     
  5. Jul 28, 2009 #4

    Dick

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    I don't get it. The result is the ith entry in a zero vector. How might that not be zero?
     
  6. Jul 29, 2009 #5
    If addition or scalar multiplication are redefined, then the zero vector can have nonzero entries. So since the problem doesn't say anything about that, I am to assume that everything is normal?
     
  7. Jul 29, 2009 #6

    Dick

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    If they don't explicitly tell you to use a nonstandard addition or scalar product, then sure, assume everything is normal.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Orthogonal compliment proof
  1. Orthogonality proof (Replies: 0)

  2. Proof of orthogonality (Replies: 0)

Loading...