Orthogonal Integral

  • Thread starter nicksauce
  • Start date
  • #1
nicksauce
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
1,272
5
On page 102 of Introduction to Quantum Mechanics, Griffiths writes that
[tex]\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}e^{i\lambda x}e^{-i \mu x}dx = 2\pi\delta(\lambda-\mu)[/tex]

I don't see how this follows. If you replace lambda with mu, then you get a cancellation, and the integral of 1dx. Am I missing something?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Fredrik
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
10,872
415
I think you would have to know a bunch of stuff about distributions and integration theory to understand that. I can't say that I do, so I can only give you a very non-rigorous argument based on some ugly manipulations with Fourier transforms:

We know that if f is a nice enough function, it has a Fourier transform g that can be defined by

[tex]g(p)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int f(y)e^{-ipy}dy[/tex]

The theorem that guarantees that also says that f can now be expressed as

[tex]f(x)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int g(p)e^{ipx}dp[/tex].

If we insert the first expression into the second and recklessly switch the order of the integrations, we get

[tex]f(x)=\int f(y)\bigg(\frac{1}{2\pi}\int e^{ip(x-y)}dp\bigg)dy[/tex]

So if there's some way to justify switching the order of the integrations (which would have to include a new definition of what we mean by an "integral"), the expression in parentheses must be [itex]\delta(x-y)[/itex].
 
  • #3
nicksauce
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
1,272
5
Okay that (sort of) makes sense. Thanks!
 
  • #4
173
0
TO be more rigorous you should introduce delta as generalized function and then use a limiting procedure on test-function space D!
 

Related Threads on Orthogonal Integral

  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
10K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
20K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
724
Replies
1
Views
1K
Top