Our Beautiful Universe - Photos and Videos

  • #1,476
391
395
I caught 3 frames @ 1800mm f/12 1/1000th sec 3200iso in RAW format during an ISS flyover last night. It was over Redding, California, USA at about 6:46p local time on 11/19/21. I converted just the green channel of the individual frames to a short video.

I'm not sure if I'm seeing any actual details or if it's all artifacts...

Using some noise reduction and histogram stretching techniques in Adobe Lightroom I was able to obtain these color versions (0.463 arcsec/pixel):

IMG-7127-2.jpg


IMG-7130-2.jpg


IMG-7131-2.jpg


72911393-AE81-412E-A11E-1A243E243FDE.jpeg


482416D8-F5F1-4379-ACDB-2F1A52045557.jpeg


BCFAB8C5-52A8-41CA-87F6-BEBA8363CBDC.jpeg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes DennisN and collinsmark
  • #1,477
391
395
Jupiter:
jupiter.jpg
 
  • #1,478
391
395
Saturn:
saturn.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes collinsmark and DennisN
  • #1,479
330
369
Hello,
its interesting images, its quite similar to my results. Which gear you use for these..?
thank you and lot of succes :smile:
 
  • #1,480
DennisN
Gold Member
2020 Award
1,809
4,436
Some new fun and pretty affordable gear (homemade and second hand):


Home-built Star Focusing Aid

I got inspired by the page I posted before about building a star focusing aid from some kind of perforated screen.

At home I had a couple of very thin perforated plastic screens which are for ventilation holes in computers and other electronic equipment (you put them in front of holes to protect the equipment from some dust and other things getting in). I'm pretty sure such screens can be easily found online (I think I got mine from AliExpress a couple of years ago).

I cut out two quadratic pieces of cardboard (120 x 120 mm) and then cut out quadratic holes (60 x 60 mm) in each of them, put them on top of each other and merged them with duct tape. I used two pieces of cardboard to make the frame more solid. Why quadratic and not circular? Well, it was easier to cut quadratic pieces and the shape really doesn't matter.

Then I put a cut-out plastic perforated screen in front of the 60 x 60 mm hole and secured it with duct tape.

It's not pretty, but it seems to work. I've tried it with a 400 mm tele lens on remote lights and it produces dotted diffraction spikes as a focusing aid. It will be put to test in the field on real stars.

I will also drill a couple of holes in the frame, put in and secure some small rods in the holes and connect a rubber band or something to the rods, so the focusing aid can be put in front of on any lens (up to ca 120 mm in diameter, though the perforated screen is smaller of course). Thanks to the material used, the focusing aid also got extremely lightweight.

Here's the "one size fits all" focusing aid:

Star Focusing Aid (1).jpg


Star Focusing Aid (2).jpg

(only the highest quality cardboard and duct tape were used to produce this premium product :smile:)


Fast Lenses

Here's a lens I won yesterday on a Swedish auction site (for $173) which I'm really excited to test.

Samyang 12mm f2.jpg

Samyang 12mm f/2.0

It's a Samyang 12mm f/2.0 ultrawide (ca 95-99 degrees field of view, IIRC) and also pretty fast lens, which is said to be great for low light photography and thus wide photography of the night sky. The same lens is also marketed under the brand "Rokinon".

I am very excited to test this lens at dark sites in the near future. :smile:

Two reviews of the lens:
Another lens I've been looking for is the Canon nFD 50mm f1.4, which is a pretty fast 50mm, also good for low light conditions. I found one in excellent condition on Ebay from Japan for $90 (+$21 shipping), which I ordered yesterday.

Canon nFD 50mm f1,4.jpg

Canon nFD 50mm f/1.4

Teleconverter

I also won this teleconverter recently on a Swedish online auction, and I got it dirt cheap. I payed $1 for it :biggrin: (+$6 shipping). It's a 2x teleconverter for Canon FD lenses, which doubles the focal length.

Canon Teleconverter.jpg

Canon FD Teleconverter (2X CFE TELEPLUS MC6)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes collinsmark and Devin-M
  • #1,481
Photo from the Bohemian Higlands with the milky way core.

- Sony A7 + Tamron 24/2.8 + Sky Watcher Star Adventurer mount
- Foreground is panorama from 3 images, sky is panorama from 3 images (each stacked from 9 expositions).
- Edited in: Photoshop, PixInsight and PTGui
Lipská hora (3).jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Love
  • Like
Likes Devin-M and DennisN
  • #1,482
391
395
Looks like the moon, but actually an overexposed crescent of Venus...

IMG-7037.jpg

Hello,
its interesting images, its quite similar to my results. Which gear you use for these..?
thank you and lot of succes :smile:
Thanks... it's a Meade Maksutov-Cassegrain LX85 1800mm focal 150mm (6") aperture f/12 w/ Nikon D800 on a Star Adventurer Pro 2i (overloaded 2-3x past the weight limit I should add)... I'm getting 0.463 arcsec/pixel with that combination and I've been running the numbers on Astrometry.net and Stellarium and I think it must actually be closer to 2180mm f/14.5, for some reason...
 
  • Like
Likes PhysicoRaj, DennisN, collinsmark and 1 other person
  • #1,483
Keith_McClary
Gold Member
681
1,261
perforated plastic screens which are for ventilation holes
What pitch (holes per cm) is good? Would window screen work? I learned:
Standard screens have a mesh size of 18 by 16, meaning there are 18 squares per inch from the top left corner to the top right corner (also referred to as warp) and 16 squares per inch from the top left corner to the bottom left corner (also referred to as fill).
(I can't find that meaning of "fill" in my Oxford.)
 
  • #1,484
DennisN
Gold Member
2020 Award
1,809
4,436
What pitch (holes per cm) is good? Would window screen work?
I don't know, maybe :smile:. I just did it with the perforated plastic sceens I had, i.e. trial and error.
But since you asked I just measured the holes on my screen and they are about 0.9 mm in diameter (ca 9-10 holes per cm).

The holes in the splatter screen the other guy used (on this page) looks a bit larger to my eyes.
I guess they are about 1-1.5 mm in diameter.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Likes Keith_McClary
  • #1,485
391
395
the Moon (11/19/21):

moon-1-IMG-7257.jpg


moon-2-IMG-7257.jpg


2180mm f/14.5 Maksutov-Cassegrain w/ Nikon D800, 1/1250th sec, 400iso, 50% crops, single shot, raw mode, edited Adobe Lightroom & Photoshop
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Love
Likes DennisN and collinsmark
  • #1,486
DennisN
Gold Member
2020 Award
1,809
4,436
the Moon (11/19/21):
Very cool! It looks like you took them from orbit. Which mission are you on? :smile:
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes Borg and Keith_McClary
  • #1,487
391
395
Phantom Galaxy - Distance: 32 million light years

phantom_galaxy.jpg


phantom_galaxy_100pc_crop.jpg


22x 3.5 min (1.28 hrs) @ 6400iso 2180mm f/14.5

4246498.png


4246498-1.png


4246498-2.png

5959113-1.jpeg

5959113.jpeg

316875DA-0F67-4D18-A5E2-663CC8864044.jpeg

8569733B-934A-42C5-86CD-5AF930D75E99.jpeg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes collinsmark and DennisN
  • #1,488
collinsmark
Homework Helper
Gold Member
2,987
1,540
Phantom Galaxy - Distance: 32 million light years

Nice. The Phantom Galaxy (Messier 74) is a difficult target (very low "surface brightness" for a Messier object). -- I'm presently working on that target too, but I still have several more nights of data to take. Image to come in the nearish future.
 
  • #1,489
391
395
Nice. The Phantom Galaxy (Messier 74) is a difficult target (very low "surface brightness" for a Messier object). -- I'm presently working on that target too, but I still have several more nights of data to take. Image to come in the nearish future.
Thanks. I think my biggest challenge last night was the wind. I think only 1 out of 22 of my 3.5 minute sub-frames wasn’t affected. 8 of them were so bad the software couldn’t align them but I went ahead and stacked the other 16 even though they were pretty bad and I think that’s mostly the reason it came out so blurry. I think the Star Adventurer 2i Pro is “the little tracker that could” when conditions are perfect but its very susceptible to wind and can take up to 2 minutes to stop wobbling once it starts.
 
  • Like
Likes collinsmark
  • #1,490
391
395
This is what the 3.5 minute subframes (x22) looked like from the wind:

 
  • Like
Likes DennisN and collinsmark
  • #1,492
1
2
You know guys, I'm really amazed what way humanity has done to reach that development level we have now. Sputnik-1 was the first satellite in space. It spent 3 months in space, completed over 1400 Earth's orbits and travelled 70+ million km! I'll just attach a small documentary video, you should definitely see it!
 
  • Like
Likes DennisN and collinsmark
  • #1,493
391
395
6AC73CF1-119F-4F5A-8756-1BCF07743A2B.jpeg
 
  • Like
Likes Keith_McClary, collinsmark and DennisN
  • #1,494
DennisN
Gold Member
2020 Award
1,809
4,436
I see Orion and the Pleiades (at least I've learned something from being out in the cold nights. A couple of years ago I would not recognize the Pleiades :smile: ).
Are you shooting the Orion nebula?
 
  • #1,495
DennisN
Gold Member
2020 Award
1,809
4,436
I've been annoyed at the consistently bad weather lately, particularly since I'm very keen and excited to try my new gear. As consolation I did a parody clip to let off some steam.

I know this meme has been done to death, but the astro/stargazing community all over the world is in desperate need of a parody. At least I had fun doing it. :smile:

Here it is, premiering on PF:

 
  • Like
Likes Devin-M and collinsmark
  • #1,496
391
395
Are you shooting the Orion nebula?

Orion Nebula:

Orion_1.jpg


Orion_800x620_100pc_crop_1.jpg


Orion_800x620_100pc_crop_2.jpg


Orion_800x620_100pc_crop_3.jpg


Orion_800x620_100pc_crop_4.jpg


Orion_620h.jpg


These were with 30 second (x120) exposures at 1600iso, 2180mm f/14.5 on a Nikon D800 full frame dslr under moonless bortle 6 skies, no filters. View in WorldWideTelescope
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Love
Likes Keith_McClary, collinsmark and DennisN
  • #1,497
330
369
Excelent image of O.nebulae, especially last one.!!:)
 
  • #1,499
330
369
and Hitler clip is super as well.. (it seems that this part of movie is generally used for parody maker --I see
two more parody clip with this already..
 
  • #1,500
DennisN
Gold Member
2020 Award
1,809
4,436
and Hitler clip is super as well..
I'm glad you enjoyed it. I had fun doing it. It's been cloudy here for weeks now, and I was tired of seeing the grey skies. :smile:

(it seems that this part of movie is generally used for parody maker --I see
two more parody clip with this already..
Oh yes, there have been many, many parodies done over the years using that scene. :smile:
Before I did mine, I searched for an astro parody of that scene, but it seems it had not been done before.
 

Related Threads on Our Beautiful Universe - Photos and Videos

Replies
2
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
22
Views
7K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Top