Insights Blog
-- Browse All Articles --
Physics Articles
Physics Tutorials
Physics Guides
Physics FAQ
Math Articles
Math Tutorials
Math Guides
Math FAQ
Education Articles
Education Guides
Bio/Chem Articles
Technology Guides
Computer Science Tutorials
Forums
Classical Physics
Quantum Physics
Quantum Interpretations
Special and General Relativity
Atomic and Condensed Matter
Nuclear and Particle Physics
Beyond the Standard Model
Cosmology
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Other Physics Topics
Trending
Featured Threads
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Classical Physics
Quantum Physics
Quantum Interpretations
Special and General Relativity
Atomic and Condensed Matter
Nuclear and Particle Physics
Beyond the Standard Model
Cosmology
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Other Physics Topics
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Astronomy and Cosmology
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Does Our Picture of the Universe Become Less Accurate the Farther We Look?
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Teichii492, post: 6197123, member: 471373"] Yes. Since we can only view parts of the universe that are light-years away using various forms of detection equipment. The resolution of our picture is limited by the sensitivity of that equipment. However, we do assume that the laws of physics that apply here, apply in those far-away places, in the same way. If you are referring to the accuracy of our theories when applied to distant locations, then as far as we can tell from observations, our assumption is correct, the theories that seem to apply in our local area, appear to also apply in distant locations. The issue being that the farther away we look, the more those objects are 'red-shifted' out of view and require ever more sensitive equipment to detect. There is a notion in cosmology called 'The Cosmological Principle'. Which has so far held up to observational evidence. We observe that the universe is statistically uniform at scales on the order of a few hundred million light-years. Statistically uniform, meaning that the distribution of matter seems to be the same in every direction when you view the universe on a large scale. In fact, the structure we observe in the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation, CMBR (the oldest light we can observe in the sky) is also uniform on large scales in all directions. More importantly, it seems that physics as we currently understand it has many satisfactory explanations for the structure that the CMBR exhibits. Since the CMBR can be thought of as a surface, behind which we cannot see directly, we infer the properties of regions further away/older than this surface due to the fine detail that this surface exhibits. We continue construct ever more precise methods of measuring the detail of this surface to refine our understanding of the early universe. For a good visualisation of how accurately we can view such a distant 'suface' and how we continue to refine the resolution of that image, take a look at this comparison of two images of it. [CENTER] [ATTACH type="full" width="414px" alt="245532"]245532[/ATTACH] [/CENTER] So in summary, yes our 'picture' of the universe becomes less accurate the further back we look, but that hasn't stopped us from seeing it with exquisite detail. I think this question also deals with the complexities of relativity. We can only infer what the current state of an object like a star might be based on our theories of their evolution. We can make a decent guess as to the state of that star at our currently measured age of the universe, but we cannot possibly make an observation of the state of that star 'as it is now'. This is because the only way we have of measuring the state of that star is via the photons (or perhaps graviational waves) it emits, which travel at the speed of light. It makes no difference if we send a craft to physically investigate that region of space, since it's messages to us will also be limited by the speed of light. All measurement of objects (whether they are 1mm away from the measuring device, or 1 million light years) will be a measurement of that object at some time in the past. Determining what is 'there' is subject to the limits of the speed of light and our detector sensitivity. Another interesting thing for you to look up is 'Angular resolution'. Which deals with our ability to distinguish between two separate sources of light. For example, due to increasing telescope resolution we have discovered that many stars previously observed as one star, turned out to be two-stars, making up a binary star system. We have discovered that these binary stars are much more common than had been observed. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Post reply
Forums
Astronomy and Cosmology
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Does Our Picture of the Universe Become Less Accurate the Farther We Look?
Back
Top