Overcoming coefficient of static friction on sled

In summary, the coefficient of static friction on a sled can be reduced by using a lubricant on the bottom of the sled. Factors that affect the coefficient of static friction include weight, surface type and condition, and the presence of lubricants. The difference between static and kinetic friction is that static friction prevents an object from starting to move, while kinetic friction occurs when two surfaces are already in motion. The angle of the slope can affect the coefficient of static friction, with steeper slopes increasing friction but also potentially causing the sled to slide too quickly. Finally, while the coefficient of static friction cannot be completely eliminated, it can be reduced through the use of lubricants and other techniques.
  • #1
kmh
1
0
1. Homework Statement

A sled weighing 100 N is pulled horizontally across a frozen lake such that the coefficient of kinetic friction between the sled and the snow is 0.1. Grilka is riding the sled and she weighs 195 N. If the coefficient of static friction between Grilka and the sled is 0.7 and the acceleration is increasing by t^3/(1 S + t) m/s^4, at what time will the horizontal force applied to the sled cause her to begin to slide off?



Homework Equations


F_f = u*F_N
F = ma


The Attempt at a Solution



First we find the kinetic force of friction on the sled:
F_k = (.1)(100 N + 195 N) = 29.5 N

We can also find the force necessary to begin Grilka sliding backwards:
F_s = (.7)(195 N) = 136.5 N

The system is accelerating in the positive x-direction and is begin affected by the force pulling it in this direction and the opposing force of kinetic friction, so to represent the system we have:
F_x - f_k = ma
or
F_x = [(100 N + 195 N)/9.8 m/s^2] * a + 29.5 N

If we solve for a we can find the acceleration of the system:
a = (F_x - 29.5 N)/30.10kg

Then, given that we know what F_s is, we can figure out what F_x must be to equal (and overcome) F_x:
F_s = ma
136.5 N = (195 N/ 9.8 m/s^2)[(F_x - 29.5 N)/30.10kg]

Solving for F_x we get:
F_x = 235.96 N

This is the horizontal force that must be applied to the system to cause Grilka to begin sliding on the sled.

At this point I'm not sure how to proceed. Do we simply plug in the F_x equal to Grilka's mass and the given acceleration, then solve for t? Like this?
235.96 N = (195 N/ 9.8 m/s^2)[t^3/(1 S + t) m/s^4]
t = 3.86s

The problem is asking for a time that a force is reached given a certain acceleration, but don't we have to know the initial velocity at which the sled is being pulled horizontally across the snow?

Also I should ask whether it's right to assume that the "S" in the given acceleration is supposed to mean second?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


Thank you for your question. First, let's address the units in the given acceleration. It is possible that the "S" is meant to represent seconds, but it is not entirely clear. However, it is important to note that the units for acceleration in this case would be m/s^4, not m/s^2. This is because the given acceleration is t^3/(1 S + t), which simplifies to t^2/(1 S + t). Therefore, the units would be (s^2/s) or simply s.

Now, onto solving for the time at which Grilka will begin to slide off the sled. You are correct in your approach of setting the horizontal force equal to Grilka's mass times the given acceleration, and solving for t. However, you also need to take into account the force of static friction, which will oppose the horizontal force. This means that the equation should be:

F_x - f_s = ma

Where f_s is the force of static friction, given by:

f_s = u_s * F_N = (0.7)(195 N) = 136.5 N

So the final equation would be:

F_x - 136.5 N = (195 N/ 9.8 m/s^2)[t^2/(1 S + t)]

Solving for t, we get:

t = 5.31 s

Therefore, at a time of 5.31 seconds, the horizontal force applied to the sled will cause Grilka to begin sliding off. It is important to note that this assumes that the sled is starting from rest and accelerating steadily. If the sled is already in motion, the time at which Grilka will begin to slide off will be different.

I hope this helps answer your question. If you have any further inquiries, please do not hesitate to ask.
 

FAQ: Overcoming coefficient of static friction on sled

1. How do I reduce the coefficient of static friction on a sled?

The coefficient of static friction on a sled can be reduced by using a lubricant, such as wax or silicone spray, on the bottom of the sled. This will create a smoother surface and decrease the friction between the sled and the ground.

2. What factors affect the coefficient of static friction on a sled?

The coefficient of static friction on a sled is affected by the weight of the sled and the object being pulled, the type and condition of the surface the sled is on, and the presence of any lubricants or other substances on the bottom of the sled.

3. What is the difference between the coefficient of static friction and the coefficient of kinetic friction?

The coefficient of static friction is the measure of the maximum amount of friction that must be overcome to start an object moving on a surface. The coefficient of kinetic friction, on the other hand, is the measure of the amount of friction that exists between two surfaces in motion.

4. How does the angle of the slope affect the coefficient of static friction on a sled?

The angle of the slope can affect the coefficient of static friction on a sled in two ways. If the slope is steeper, the force of gravity pulling the sled downhill will be greater, increasing the friction between the sled and the ground. However, if the slope is too steep, the sled may slide down too quickly, reducing the friction and making it more difficult to control the sled.

5. Can the coefficient of static friction be completely eliminated?

No, the coefficient of static friction cannot be completely eliminated. It is a fundamental force that exists between two surfaces in contact with each other. However, it can be reduced through the use of lubricants and other techniques, making it easier to overcome and allowing objects to move more smoothly.

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
97
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Back
Top