As part of proving that d/dt <p> = <-Del V> you have to use the fact that < dp/dt> = 0 when p is not an explicit function of time.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I'm not clear on what this means. Any insights to share?

From classical mechanics, if there is a potential V = -k/r then there will be a force on a particle and the momentum will evolve over time. In Q-M, this is an implicit function of time and so still <dp/dt > = 0.

An explicit function of time would be V = -kcos(t) / r and now

< dp/dt> is not equal to zero. p still evolves over time.

I can't see why implicit or explicit function makes any difference mathematically.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# P implicit vs. explicit function of time

Loading...

Similar Threads for implicit explicit function | Date |
---|---|

At most explicit time-dependent operator | Jun 28, 2014 |

Explicit form of scalar propagator | Nov 10, 2013 |

Lagrangian explicitly preserves symmetries of a theory? | Aug 25, 2013 |

Explicit form for representing two spin 1/2 system | Apr 3, 2011 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**