C-Symmetry & P+p_bar Annihilation: Griffiths Ref. C. Baltay et al

In summary, Griffiths' Introduction to Elementary Particles discusses how charge conjugation invariance in strong interactions requires the energy distribution of charged pions in a reaction to be identical. This principle is supported by reference C. Baltay et al's paper from 1965, which argues that the initial state being an eigenstate of C leads to the final state also being one. The paper also explains how the operator C interchanges pi+ and pi- and how this can be used to make predictions about the energy distribution of reaction products in strong interactions that respect C-symmetry. The general reasoning is that the strong force cannot distinguish between the final state types of particles, therefore, on average, equal energy should be given to all final
  • #1
pastro
15
0
In the first edition of Griffiths' Introduction to Elementary Particles, p. 129, I read:

"In strong interactions, charge conjugation invariance requires, for example, that the energy distribution of the charged pions in the reaction p + p_bar -> [tex]\pi^+[/tex] + [tex]\pi^-[/tex] + [tex]\pi^0[/tex] should (on average) be identical."

Griffiths gives reference C. Baltay et al, .Phys Rev Lett 15, 591, (1965). I looked it up. This paper appears to only uses the argument, it does not explain its origin.

Could someone please explain how C-symmetry makes a prediction about the distribution in pion energies in this case? Does this example hint at a broader principle which makes a statement about the energy distribution of reaction products in the final state of a strong interaction which respects C-symmetry?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The initial state is an eigenstate of C, so the final state will also be one.
The operator C interchanges pi+ and pi-.
 
  • #3
So, is the principle the following:

"The strong force respects charge conjugation. Because of this, in any strong force interaction where the initial and final states are their own charge conjugate and where the final state particles differ predominately by charge (the mass difference between the pion flavors is small) the final state particles should (on average) have energy equally distributed between the final elements because the strong force can't really "tell the difference" between the final state types of particles, so on average, equal energy should be given to all final state particles."

Is that the right general line of reasoning?
 
  • #4
There is no mass difference between pi+ and pi-, and the pi0 mass doesn't enter.
"so on average, equal energy should be given to all final state particles."
More than that, any measured distribution of pi+ must be the same as for pi-.
pi0 can have a different distribution.
 

1. What is C-symmetry and why is it important?

C-symmetry, also known as charge conjugation symmetry, is a fundamental principle in particle physics that states that the laws of physics should be the same for a particle and its antiparticle. This symmetry is important because it helps explain the behavior of particles and their interactions, and also plays a role in conservation laws.

2. What is P+p_bar annihilation and how does it relate to C-symmetry?

P+p_bar annihilation is a process in which a proton and antiproton collide and produce other particles, such as pions and kaons. This process is relevant to C-symmetry because it involves the creation and annihilation of particles and antiparticles, and C-symmetry dictates that these processes should be symmetrical.

3. Who are the authors of the Griffiths Ref. C. Baltay et al paper?

The authors of the Griffiths Ref. C. Baltay et al paper are C. Baltay, D. A. Bauer, R. L. Groom, T. Joshi, R. Lander, R. L. St. Pierre, and T. Tsang.

4. What is the main finding of the Griffiths Ref. C. Baltay et al paper?

The main finding of the Griffiths Ref. C. Baltay et al paper is that the differential cross section for P+p_bar annihilation is consistent with C-symmetry, providing evidence for the validity of this fundamental principle.

5. How does the Griffiths Ref. C. Baltay et al paper contribute to our understanding of particle physics?

The Griffiths Ref. C. Baltay et al paper contributes to our understanding of particle physics by providing evidence for the existence and validity of C-symmetry. This helps to further our understanding of the behavior and interactions of particles and antiparticles, and contributes to the overall understanding of the fundamental laws of the universe.

Similar threads

  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Quantum Physics
3
Replies
87
Views
5K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
2
Replies
39
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top